b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9241039 (Thread)

# haha
this might be true

edit: in other news, b3ta develops intense hatred for someone with more skill than most, because he has a different political slant.
do people here know when they're being petty?
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:18, archived)
# Tom Petty?
I doubt that it's the different political slant. Personally I just think he's a prize conch.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:26, archived)
# perhaps, and perhaps this isn't the best example of his work, but i get really narked at the fact he posts some really well made stuff and the children here just start jeering
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:28, archived)
# i don't hate him at all
you on the other hand, can't bloody abide you now piss off
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:28, archived)
# Yeah
He looked at me funny once so I don't like him either.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:29, archived)
# i'm also told he doesn't wash his hands after doing number 2's
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:31, archived)
# I don't hate him :(
I find his conspiracy theories mental, but I don't hate him.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:28, archived)
# I saw no evidence of "more skill"
I saw lots of patronisation though.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:30, archived)
# True
He appears to be an arrogant, patronising, self-righteous cock, but I don't hate him.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:31, archived)
# I think it's username envy.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:32, archived)
# he is good
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:32, archived)
# is this good enough?
i90.photobucket.com/albums/k272/davodees/Hal--.jpg

i think this is far and away beyond what most of us can do
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:32, archived)
# Agree
But unfortunately if I don't like the person creating the work, my opinion of it is somewhat tainted.

I'M ONLY A MAN WITH WEAKNESSES :(
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:34, archived)
# I have weaknesses too!
Another one and we can make a badge.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:38, archived)
# "most of us"
is subjective.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:35, archived)
# ok with the exceptions of the happy toasts, the TGAs and the like most of us aren't much cop
clearly people like yourself aren't included in my "most of us". a quick look down the board shows that
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:39, archived)
# I think more people than you think on here can, but just can't be arsed really
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:49, archived)
# ^very much this
I'm a techno-numpty at 'shopping. I get by on the most basic of cs tools, for a laugh, and not much else really.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:59, archived)
# ok i'll leave it,
i obviously didn't make my point very well and upset everyone.

*regrets even opening his mouth*
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 21:03, archived)
# oo-er
that sounds a bit generalisey.

I've done similar things to catnippp in the past, I just don't have the time, patience or will to do it anymore.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 21:16, archived)
# Yes that is good
But I haven't seen his stuff before. I only came across him *fnarr fnarr* last night for the first time and found him patronising.
It's a fair enough opinion.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:37, archived)
# oh he is, no question. i just get a bit bugged by b3ta's fickleness sometimes
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:42, archived)
# I can't speak for anyone else
in much the same manner as you can't speak for me. I have no hatred for him. Perhaps a little sympathy. What I don't want is to be preached nonsense to by anyone so I'll keep arguing in the vain hope that it stops.
Other than that he can carry on.
oh and "more skill than most" is subjective.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:32, archived)
# of course i'm being subjective.
i just get fed up of seeing everyone being so aggressive when some of the stuff he produces is really good.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:36, archived)
# Well here's the thing young man.
He's going to get the kind of treatment he deserves for preaching his agenda to me until he stops it. You will get the same treatment for preaching to me that you don't like my attitude just because he knows how the warp tool works in CS.

If he wants to be a cunt then I'd suggest you don't attempt to back him up.
You don't find all my haters telling people that they should suck me off because i'm actually shit hot with tattyshop do you? No, and neither should they.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:40, archived)
# i'm not preaching at you at all.
i just like seeing credit where its due.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:44, archived)
# I agree with credit.
And I've given him my fair share.
He does not however deserve to be allowed to tell lies make unsubstantiated claims without being challenged by the sane.

It's like saying "Hey Paloma, don't hate your father who abandoned you and treated your mother like a whore, look, he makes nice pictures, some of them have one big eye!".
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:50, archived)
# i'm not getting the reference but ok
i'm not saying don't take the piss when he makes mad claims, of course not, thats not in anyway my right.
you know what i mean, in previous posts, good posts, a lot of people seem happier to jeer at him rather than comment on his work.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:56, archived)
# Ooh ooh
*raises hand*
Patronise me next please!
;)
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:46, archived)
# I am rather good aren't I?
;)
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:47, archived)
# You may have noticed...
awf!

sorry, i am doing better.

I am no better at art than anyone else, it is just I get paid to do it, you would be a lot better if i paid you too. But this is not a competition, if it was pasanonic destroys my shopping abilities easily, i am only a hack cut and paste nobody, with amazingly accurate conspiracy theories.
.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:47, archived)
# now you're getting on my tits as well
and i agree with a few of these theories
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:53, archived)
# I love your art.
I deride your theories and despair at your attitude in persisting with bringing them here.
I'd be quite happy to share jollies with you if you could leave that side of your life on Rense.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:55, archived)
# ^this is basically what i meant
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 21:01, archived)
# accurate theories do require substantiation, last time I checked.
It's not defined by some ex-tv-host-footballer making up stories and ignoring viable information.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 21:00, archived)
# I think it's primarily his demeanour that is most offensive
patronising everyone with sweeping categorisations of everyone as being "blind sheeples" is not a way for people to get clicks and nice chat, whether they're posting bmps with a head-dobber, or channelling Leonardo Da Vinci.

His arrogance is what rubs me up the wrong way, I find his art impressive, and his theories sad and ridiculous.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:49, archived)
# ^this :)
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:52, archived)
# ^very much this
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:56, archived)
# My arrogance on the other hand,
you want to bathe naked in?
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 20:59, archived)
# I find your defence of your sexual insecurities more endearing
than his ideological insecurities.

Your cuntishness has basis. When someone proves to you that your cuntishness has no basis, you tend to be human about it, and take it back. I've done it a couple of times, Faxe beer being an example which unaccountably springs to mind.

You're a cunt. I like some cunts, I don't like others. That's the way of the world.

Edit: After giving it some thought, I think your way with words, rather than your opinionating, entertains me. You write quite well.
(, Thu 5 Mar 2009, 21:08, archived)