
/nicely done, btw
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:43,
archived)

/no time these days - except for the silly exocet one this morning
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:49,
archived)

but 99% of users will flame a newbie within an inch of their lives
if they dare post a couple of images close together or in a short space of time. It's 'frowned' upon by the general consensus here.
It's not as if posting other new pictures in existing threads, or several new pictures in one thread won't attract the same amount of replies/clicks,
and it would also help to slow the board down a bit and give other, maybe newer, users a chance to shine on the board and stay on the main page a bit longer
/just a humble opinion, and nothing personal to anyone
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:53,
archived)
if they dare post a couple of images close together or in a short space of time. It's 'frowned' upon by the general consensus here.
It's not as if posting other new pictures in existing threads, or several new pictures in one thread won't attract the same amount of replies/clicks,
and it would also help to slow the board down a bit and give other, maybe newer, users a chance to shine on the board and stay on the main page a bit longer
/just a humble opinion, and nothing personal to anyone

but start as I mean to go on, and all that ;)
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 12:56,
archived)


As said, I love Ninjs' (and Moleys) work regardless, but it's not a case of 'keeping it going', that argument is redundant.
The board keeps going regardless, but it would be nice if the 'general consensus' worked for regulars as well as new people.
e.g. If a small handful of people are consistently posting, why would a new user, who may have spent a considerable time on something, want to post if within 30-45mins it's pushed right off the board by a series of quickly 'shopped 'fillers'.
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:01,
archived)
The board keeps going regardless, but it would be nice if the 'general consensus' worked for regulars as well as new people.
e.g. If a small handful of people are consistently posting, why would a new user, who may have spent a considerable time on something, want to post if within 30-45mins it's pushed right off the board by a series of quickly 'shopped 'fillers'.

The same 6 faces, bodies and backgrounds swapping in a random order...
I probably won't, though.
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:11,
archived)
I probably won't, though.

REVOLUTION! *stands in a big hall throwing bits of paper about covered in CDCs and knocking over tables*
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:19,
archived)

king of b3ta, tell us, how often may we post?
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:02,
archived)

I was merely pointing out a 'general consensus' for newbies, and the complete opposite applied to regulars.
It's pandering to the 'clique' accusations that oft get bandied around here.
As also said, just a humble opinion. It means diddly squat in reality.
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:04,
archived)
It's pandering to the 'clique' accusations that oft get bandied around here.
As also said, just a humble opinion. It means diddly squat in reality.


but a vocal minority nonetheless that often gets backed up by others once uttered.
My comments above were trying to veer away from such flaming by merely pointing out
the 'one rule for one, one for others' approach that is often (sadly) adopted.
( ,
Mon 16 Nov 2009, 13:18,
archived)
My comments above were trying to veer away from such flaming by merely pointing out
the 'one rule for one, one for others' approach that is often (sadly) adopted.