www.heelarious.com/
Un-fucking-believable
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 15:13, Reply)
and had pretty much the same reaction. As someone who only ever wears heels when dressed up anyway, and has a serious problem with the range of 'adult' clothes available for even the youngest children/babies my first reaction was of disgust
But then I thought about it and realised that I don't object as much as I'd thought. They're not designed for walking babies, just decorative, and it's a funny costume finish. There's some pretty bizzare costumes for babies out there so you either get disgusted at those too or you accept that it's just a bit of silliness. I don't find costumes objectionable as long as they don't harm the baby, and they're only a short term thing, so these fall firmly in that category for me.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 15:24, Reply)
The Metro really is a pile of shit isn't it? Nemi is as funny as gastric cancer.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 15:57, Reply)
the writer isn't giving her good material to work with!
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 16:02, Reply)
The thing that caps it for me is that it is free!
Also prevent boredom while on the 20 minute bus ride to work.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 16:13, Reply)
...The Metro's produced by the same media group responsible for the Daily Mail. Which is why each Metro is often reheated leftovers of yesterday's Mail.
That and fluff pieces based on circular e-mails from the turn of the century.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 16:50, Reply)
*didnt know it was owned by The Hate tho.
*Metro seems to be lacking in the hate/shock story department.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 17:08, Reply)
*Metro is predominantly read by students and young people (ie: under 30s), less interested in the ANYTHING INVENTED AFTER 1901 WILL KILL YOU TO DEATH attitude of The Hate
*Hate has been scientifically proven to be exclusively readable by the over 70s, sort of like that high-pitched "Mosquito" thing they used to put outside shops to keep the under-15s away but in reverse.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 21:35, Reply)
aside from the rediculousness of anyone considering buying these shoes, is the fact that the comments within the article, imply that anyone wearing high heels is a sex object with loose morals.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 15:56, Reply)
Females of all ages wear dresses.
Females of all ages wear knickers/pants.
Boys of all ages wear shoes.
Girls don't wear shoes?
*thinks...these are play shoes surely, they don't have real heals (they're soft)and obviously not meant for walking in.
*For those of us with female children, which of you can honestly say they have not seen them clombing around in their mums oversized shoes?
I don't really know what the Daily Hate is aiming at with this article.
Maybe they want us to think that buying anything overtly feminin for our female children means that you are a peadophile.
*wouldnt purchase the shoes for mine, mainly coz they look fucking shit.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 16:32, Reply)
does it encourage them into teenage pregnancy??
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 17:47, Reply)
OMG. BESTIAL PORN.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 16:56, Reply)
i used to do that to play horsey with the girl nextdoor... she used to ride me for hours.. oh what fun!
obviously with my dad's slippers, not with yours =-P
edit: it's amazing what type in innocence, then re-read in flaming embarassment once it's up on a board
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 16:58, Reply)
and show it to everyone so they can see how shocking it is
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 17:22, Reply)
I think that's cute.
Pretty funny too. Not quite sure who could really think there was anything sexual going on.
(, Thu 27 Nov 2008, 21:54, Reply)