Creationists, thats who :(
(BBC News link)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 12:44, Reply)
I normally enjoy going into a big rant about those regressive retards, listing all their faults and the short comings of their beliefs, but that summed them up perfectly.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:15, Reply)
Anyone who believes that creationism is a credible theory is a twat.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 12:50, Reply)
And he calls creationists twats.
I don't think a girl could ask for more :D
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 12:57, Reply)
his wife is a b3tan!
*waves at her if she is lurking*
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:00, Reply)
:)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:01, Reply)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:03, Reply)
from what I have seen of him, and his approach to science and such, but I do have to say I prefer my science from old men in bad jumpers :)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:10, Reply)
You forget that he's a twat too though...
smile smile, awkward shrug, oh look i'm pretty and I do science... the beeb can't get enough of me!!
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:59, Reply)
in the Can-Do-No-Wrong league :-(
Big blummin meanies
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 12:55, Reply)
He's a tolerable comic actor, a decent raconteur, and tolerably smart. But... really.
I have to agree with the Willie Donaldson and Hermione Eyre appraisal of him: Stephen Fry is a stupid person's idea of a clever person.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:04, Reply)
Just someone terribly nice that you could rattle on with for hours over a bottle of red.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:07, Reply)
I'm sure you could pass a wonderful evening in his company. Still, I'm not sure he'd be my first choice.
Mind you, I don't know who would.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:08, Reply)
And as I recall, you spent and enjoyable night with a group of lushes that made short work of a bottle of Blue Nun, and came up with interesting cocktails using the dregs from glasses, not too long ago ;)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:11, Reply)
I can be drunk AND erudite and also am put out at not automatically being Enzyme's first choice as dining partner. I'll remember that next time I'm in a restaurant with him.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:56, Reply)
I should have made that clear.
Punish me.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:58, Reply)
I never thought he'd have Kerry Katona as number one.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 14:03, Reply)
She's pissed and on drugs. I think I might be in with a chance...
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 14:08, Reply)
I'm usually pissed and on drugs and you've never been that lucky.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 14:36, Reply)
it shows that I am picky about men ;-)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 14:59, Reply)
I tried to watch his documentary on depression but switched off when he bemoaned that he owned 14 ipods, 'oh poor me I just can't control myself'.... head up arse....
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:12, Reply)
that I love Jeremy Paxman on University Challenge, and I used to love William G Stewart on 15 to 1.
He is asking all these questions, but you really get the feeling that he does actually know the answer to most of the questions without actually having to look down at his cards.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 14:40, Reply)
This is hardly surprising. Being a godbanger involves taking umbridge with anything that doesn't fit your own personal Jeebus and obviously being one of the most erudite, educated, informed, enlightened and entertaining characters on the planet he's in for more than his fair share.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:08, Reply)
Quoting the article,
In the interview, Sir David said that people asked why his documentaries did not give "credit" to God for the creation of life.
"They always mean beautiful things like hummingbirds."
"I always reply by saying that I think of a little child in East Africa with a worm burrowing through his eyeball."
"The worm cannot live in any other way, except by burrowing through eyeballs."
"I find that hard to reconcile with the notion of a divine and benevolent creator."
I love this man
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:13, Reply)
It seems like a simple refutation of 'god is love' yeah right, and the eyeball worm fits into this compassion how exactly?
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:21, Reply)
Michael Behe (I think) did admit that God created malaria. So at least he's honest enough to bite that bullet.
It's a shame it's not true.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:23, Reply)
To the extent that when hypnotised in front of an audience, I was asked who my favourite celebrity was and said "I don't like celebrities, I like David Attenborough" (he then made me talk to 'David' in the audience, then convinced me I was a gorilla)
This only affirms my admiration
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:37, Reply)
However, appeals to the apparent moral failures of a creator strike me as being less powerful than simply pointing out that the existence of a non-material and non-temporal living thing is incomprehensible.
I can tolerate people believing in fairies or unicorns - I can imagine a world in which winged homunculi or horned horses exist. It's not this world, but there's nothing incoherent about it. However, a world in which supernatural beings exist simply doesn't make sense.
(I was impressed by Jonathan Miller's point that he doesn't call himself an atheist because theism seems to him to be too absurd to waste time opposing...)
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:21, Reply)
The most convincing argument, for me, is that to 'create' the staggering amount of complexity in the Universe you must concede that the Creator him/her self must be even more staggeringly complex.
Which is impossible, of course, as complexity doesn't just appear, it's the product of evolution! So who created the Creator? And so on, and so on...
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:30, Reply)
right after I punch this kitten in the face.
(, Wed 28 Jan 2009, 13:56, Reply)