mostly yes
but I call bullshit and bullshit again. Those two are clearly shopped, but the others are most likely not.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 19:41, Share, Reply)
but I call bullshit and bullshit again. Those two are clearly shopped, but the others are most likely not.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 19:41, Share, Reply)
i agree with the second
but the first could technically be done...
actually, on second thought, the second one could be done with a fake shadow...
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 19:56, Share, Reply)
but the first could technically be done...
actually, on second thought, the second one could be done with a fake shadow...
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 19:56, Share, Reply)
Technically it's possible,
but her hair, makeup, and flowers are all perfectly in place and dry, as if she was just standing there ready for the shot. Not as if she had been standing there for 3 hours while they throw buckets of water at her and hope for the best.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 20:01, Share, Reply)
but her hair, makeup, and flowers are all perfectly in place and dry, as if she was just standing there ready for the shot. Not as if she had been standing there for 3 hours while they throw buckets of water at her and hope for the best.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 20:01, Share, Reply)
Don't think the second is photoshopped
The shadow around the handle doesn't seem to entirely connect with the spoon. I suspect there's another piece of cutlery under a translucent table...
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 20:12, Share, Reply)
The shadow around the handle doesn't seem to entirely connect with the spoon. I suspect there's another piece of cutlery under a translucent table...
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 20:12, Share, Reply)
funny, i thought both of those were ok
i called bullshit on the cloud/aerosol one. as the wisp coming out of the nozzle is obviously shopped, and a couple of the perspective ones look treated due to focus/lighting cues
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 20:28, Share, Reply)
i called bullshit on the cloud/aerosol one. as the wisp coming out of the nozzle is obviously shopped, and a couple of the perspective ones look treated due to focus/lighting cues
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 20:28, Share, Reply)
And none of them look photoshopped
except for the ones that are.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 19:44, Share, Reply)
except for the ones that are.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 19:44, Share, Reply)
Not shopped, eh?
Where's this guy's shadow, then?
www.pxleyes.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/notphotoshopped/33.jpg
I call shenanigans.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 21:24, Share, Reply)
Where's this guy's shadow, then?
www.pxleyes.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/notphotoshopped/33.jpg
I call shenanigans.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 21:24, Share, Reply)
tee-hee
it's like watching young-uns marvelling at old analogue tape machines... y'see son, before mp3 we had to...
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 22:31, Share, Reply)
it's like watching young-uns marvelling at old analogue tape machines... y'see son, before mp3 we had to...
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 22:31, Share, Reply)
Looks to me like it's just a photo taken through something transparant
due to how the light is defusing through the man.
Like a sticker on a glass window.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 22:36, Share, Reply)
due to how the light is defusing through the man.
Like a sticker on a glass window.
( , Mon 7 Feb 2011, 22:36, Share, Reply)