
Warning - may contain words
tl;dr - the minister who claims it's morally wrong to pay cash in hand for work (you know, because it deprives the treasury of much-needed revenues), claimed upwards of ten grand in costs for his 2006/7 house move, including £8,550 in stamp duty, on his expenses.
If the excuse "it's OK 'cos everyone was fiddling it" works for MPs, then why not for others?
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:24, Reply)

The Minister can go fuck himself - the Govt. (not just this one) need to sort out the big companies \ huge earners who are either, not paying tax or paying less tax than is 'morally correct before he complain about the 'man on the street'. Cunt.
Cash is hand is very handy when a plumber recently did four hours of pipe work for me on a Sunday and charged £80 - ta v much, I don't earn too much these days.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:31, Reply)

A global conglomerate who offshores billions of revenue in order to avoid paying tax is acting fairly and responsibly within its rights.
Go figure.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:35, Reply)

who's job used to be creating "tax efficient structures for clients" at PWC, tax law is created by parliament and has nothing whatsoever to do with morals, therefore "efficient tax planning" is absolutely fine, morally and legally. That's the _successor_ to Dave Harnett, the chap who let Vodaphone off billions.
We're basically screwed.
/Edit: Found it. (Private Eye #1318 p30, for those following at home).
"...appt of a new chair for HM Revenue and Customs...Step forward Ian Barlow, who has built a career on tax scheming every bit as contrived as comedian Jimmy Carr's dodge - but far more costly tto the UK.
Barlow was head of tax and accountancy at KPMG from 1993 to 2001 and then became senior partner in London until 2008. Over this period he was directly responsible for selling some of the most aggressive tax avoidance schemes on the market, many of them already exposed by the Eye. Here is a taste of some that made it in to the courts..."
[snip synopsis of each dodge, many of which involve giving offshore child companies lots of tax free money, then borrowing it back from them]
"As a dyed-in-the-wool tax dodger, before it became unfashionable he wasn't shy about it. "There is no meaningful distinction to be drawn between acceptable tax planning and unacceptable tax avoidance," he declared in 1999. "Tax is an aftificial construct of legislation. If parliament deems something unacceptable, it can legislate against it. What is left is acceptable." Exploiting loopholes, however artificial, is fair same: so no room for "moral repugnance" there. What next? Bob Diamond for the Band of England no doubt..."
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 13:32, Reply)

Just because someone is a massive shit, doesn't mean you should be a tiny bit of a shit too.
Lead by example and send them to the tower
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:38, Reply)

I've no problem with the legalities of it - I think everyone knows if they get busted doing a foreigner then they're in trouble. It's when some kind of moral judgment comes into the equation that my hackles rise.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:44, Reply)

The problem with "leading by example" is that 1/ no one cares about the little people to follow & 2/ big business doesn't care about personal morality.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:56, Reply)

safe in the knowledge that you're not some kind of terrible hypocrite
(which is where all these mps are going wrong)
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:58, Reply)

So you can't.
...and also, big business/MPs et al know that the hoi polloi have extremely short term memories.... I've not bought a Sunday Times since the phone hacking scandal kicked off, but their sales recovered nicely.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:02, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation#Circulation_since_2000_2
The sunday times is heading south.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:09, Reply)

I can't find it (obv) but there was a short-term survey taken that showed the boycott of the Murdoch papers lasted as long as the general public's indignation/about a month.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:13, Reply)

"All signs point to 'No'".
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 15:16, Reply)

and do what the man is telling you...even though he's not doing the same?
how does following hypocritical advice benefit us?
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:00, Reply)

I appreciate I'm being foolishly optimistic, but I'd feel like a twat getting angry at companies fiddling their books if I was fiddling mine.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:10, Reply)

we say "everyone pays tax" thats when its a moral issue... right now its a class issue... if your rich enough or powerful you dont have to pay tax... therefore its a punishment for not being ambitious/cuntish enough...
so only the stupid and weak pay their fair amount of tax...
so when ikea is registered as a charity and the politicians tell you that your handyman neighbour is "morally wrong"
thats when its being a good little boy....
when the rich and powerful AREN'T doing it, yet saying everyone who isn't is morally wrong.
fuck that.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 13:02, Reply)

It's not being a "good little boy"
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:12, Reply)

so i' argue that while the deficit could be filled by the corporate big boys paying their share...instead we are being asked to "shop our neighbour"
thats exactly being a good little boy.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 13:24, Reply)

( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 13:55, Reply)

you dont make the corporations play ball by forcing the average man...
you go the other way round....
you make sure the big boys are paying up and THEN you go for the little guy...
if a boat had 4 holes one hole with a surface area twice the size of the other 4 holes... you wouldn't say the best solution would be to plug the smallest hole would you?
(fluid dynamics will tear this metaphor apart... but you get it)
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 14:08, Reply)

Not all tradesmen want to fix the books for whatever reason yet will be undercut by 17% anyone that does.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 11:47, Reply)

...which would have netted the treasury over 21 trillion in revenue. What's your fucking problem?
Yours sincerely
John Vodafone esq.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:24, Reply)

( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 12:50, Reply)

That's the job of preachers, philosophers and my girlfriend.
( , Tue 24 Jul 2012, 13:14, Reply)