
just roam free.
If I was a tellolist I'd organise a flash mob on the target and then not actually attend myself, just download all the videos/pics from everyone off facebook later.
(making this whole anti-terrorism over-reaction pointless as well as wrong) Edit: Or just use google earth/street view.
Job's a good 'un.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 14:54, Reply)

If you dispute something they say then they arrest you on breach of the peace.
If they provoke you and you swear, they nick you for public order.
If you try and get evidence of your own (video or audio recording) they pull the terrorism act shit out of the bag and nick you.
Also...That's a MAN's VOICE????
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 15:01, Reply)

"He fell down stairs, Your Honour".
/sarcasm
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 15:01, Reply)

With huge fucking bells on. The police were being decidedly restrained.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 15:51, Reply)

I mean how dare he take a photo in a public place. And then, as if that's not bad enough, he has the outright cheek to ask what law he's being held under. What a twat
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:31, Reply)

and you are going to get your nuts roasted. It's a simple rule.
And as per usual, the situation as presented through the audio recording is neither evidence for or against police misconduct, unless some more of the situation comes to light.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:50, Reply)

the kid blatantly knows jack shit about the law he is just provoking the officer and deserves all he gets. Repeating himself over and over again as if he has been watching too many YouTube videos on 500 year old laws that still apply if your name is Frank and you have a pet Pig called Dorris, and you masturbate into a trilby at approximately 3:27pm on a Tuesday afternoon in the library... with a candlestick... colonel mustard!
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:53, Reply)

Is just another thug gang.
Their whole name comes from the function of what they're supposed to do: Police the law.
This from someone who sued the police for wrongful arrest, and won. If there's no law to tell them what to do, then they shouldn't be doing it.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:43, Reply)

That the police were doing wrong? Beginning of the confrontation is missing, and we have to go on are the ramblings of a 15 year old who thinks he knows the law.
Sounded to me like he was causing a scene in a public place, so he was removed from the scene.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:53, Reply)

..the complete ignorance of the law on behalf of the rozzers....Clutching at straws with terrorism laws, saying it's illegal to photograph in a public place, claiming that you can't take pictures of children, and even kind of suggesting there could be paedo motives for the photographers actions. Bang out of order.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 18:00, Reply)

feeding him lines so that he looked dumb.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 19:59, Reply)

I have been present at many incidents where the police have been telling people to do this and that and when they've been asked what act they're using and what reasonable grounds for suspicion they have, they back off and stand down because they know they're in the wrong. It just depends on who's doing it. A man in a shirt with a name tag is likely to be treated much better than a young man with an intimidating hair-do and a slogan on his tshirt.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 18:39, Reply)