I forgot I had this sitting on the shelf until recently. The Usmanov Vs. Blogs saga in under a minute...
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 11:47, Reply)
I wish more "Raaarrrrgghhh-we-are-being-censored!!!11_haxzors!!" type videos would take this approach....
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:07, Reply)
oh yea i dont care because bloggers are fucking lame. nobody gives a shit what they think, everything they utter is a pile of boiled piss socks.
the end.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:18, Reply)
Although I thought fasthosts were always a bit shite myself..
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:24, Reply)
as a journalist myself. At some point, I'm going to tell the rest of the media about a certain company who used a libel claim to attempt to avoid publicity for an appalling breach of environmental law. That will be fun.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:35, Reply)
if it really was a breach of environmental law?
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:54, Reply)
... if you can have it removed without the matter straying anywhere near the inside of a court?
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:58, Reply)
but the defence of 'This is true, here is the evidence' would surely help?
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 15:06, Reply)
Then moaned to the prosecuting authority that a press release it wrote was libelous - and got coverage of it pulled from more than one website. I can't really say any more at the moment.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 15:44, Reply)
and notorious for this, as well as taking money from your ccard quietly, then telling you some time later about your new non-refundable purchases they've made for you.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:41, Reply)
This happened mainly because the law allowed Schillings to step past the author of an article and instead threaten the company hosting his website (thereby allowing them to silence a critic of their client without any of that 'day in court' nonsense).
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 12:46, Reply)
If you don't pay enough, the user agreement allows it and the company's a bit hooky they'll drop you like a stone at the slightest whiff of any complaint.
(, Tue 9 Dec 2008, 14:58, Reply)