Annoying words and phrases
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
« Go Back
Win-Win
But what if you're wrong-wrong and it goes bad-bad?
You cunt-cunt.
Cheers
( , Sat 10 Apr 2010, 11:46, 5 replies)
But what if you're wrong-wrong and it goes bad-bad?
You cunt-cunt.
Cheers
( , Sat 10 Apr 2010, 11:46, 5 replies)
Actually
That particular phrase is from game theory. In most games, one party wins, and the other loses - a game of cricket, for example, would be win-lose. However, some situations can be described as win-win, as both parties gain - exploration companies like to describe the discovery of oil as win-win, for both themselves and the local communities.
But you're right, it has been completely bastardised by the press to simply mean 'a pleasant surprise'.
( , Sat 10 Apr 2010, 12:48, closed)
That particular phrase is from game theory. In most games, one party wins, and the other loses - a game of cricket, for example, would be win-lose. However, some situations can be described as win-win, as both parties gain - exploration companies like to describe the discovery of oil as win-win, for both themselves and the local communities.
But you're right, it has been completely bastardised by the press to simply mean 'a pleasant surprise'.
( , Sat 10 Apr 2010, 12:48, closed)
I was going to put that
and feel smug yet nerdy at the same time.
( , Sat 10 Apr 2010, 13:12, closed)
and feel smug yet nerdy at the same time.
( , Sat 10 Apr 2010, 13:12, closed)
more or less means 'mutually beneficial'
which 'win' on its own does not.
( , Mon 12 Apr 2010, 21:09, closed)
which 'win' on its own does not.
( , Mon 12 Apr 2010, 21:09, closed)
« Go Back