If it's good enough for Shakespeare ...

( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 14:51, 1 reply)

Shakespeare was a bad example;
he just made it up as he went along.
www.rediculous.co.uk/
( IHaveABadFeelingAboutThis most likely working from home on, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 14:56, closed)

Elizabethans generally did. Their approach to spelling and grammar was liberal to say the very least.

( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:00, closed)

Bloody idiots; the lot of 'em.

( IHaveABadFeelingAboutThis most likely working from home on, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:07, closed)

because no one could read and write
but now nearly everyone can, there is no excuse.
( sandettie light vessel automatic New Twitter - @bollocksreally, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:35, closed)

Yebbut language is always evolving, innit?
Part of that is through common misspelling. Look at "OK" - the origins of that are already getting lost in the myftf of thyme.

Aluminium likewise - the Shermans are right, we're wrong - the i was put in by Europeans who didn't like the spelling, which was originally linguisitically more accurate.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Tue 13 Apr 2010, 15:53, closed)