data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
« Go Back
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW answer"
Well that will be a short fucking letter then, only consisting of the word "you"
Unless you meant you'd write to me, you cuntmarlin.
( , Wed 14 Apr 2010, 16:04, 6 replies)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
I'll 'phone you, or I'll ring you.
So now I simply don't know who to believe.
( , Wed 14 Apr 2010, 16:06, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
In the case of the telephone call, you are the only object.
When it comes to writing, the implied letter is the main object, and you are the second object.
( , Wed 14 Apr 2010, 16:32, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
What about the implied telephone instead of the letter?
( , Wed 14 Apr 2010, 16:33, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
"I'll write to you" means "I'll write a letter to you".
"I'll phone you" doesn't mean "I'll phone a telephone you".
( , Wed 14 Apr 2010, 17:17, closed)
« Go Back