That makes no sense.
MSG is often used a salt substitute, and food containing MSG is likely to contain less sodium, as less or no sodium is added.
( The Awful Puppy Bakery is still bored, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 16:51, 3 replies)

Erm "... used as a salt substitute ...".
Salt isn't supposed to be used in cooking as it's "Bad, hmmkay!?" -- so food laced with salt or MSG is supposed to be bad. I'm also not convinced that MSG laden food does not have any salt added?
Personally I couldn't care less as I have a cavalier attitude to salt in my food, so I'm just pointing out that it's sodium that's demonised not MSG alone.
(Me, I'm not... in any way intoxicated, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 17:36, closed)

MSG is monosodium glutamate - one sodium per glutamate. Even though there isn't any more salt added in the familiar form of sodium chloride, the addition of MSG necessarily means the addition of sodium.
(enervatrice, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 22:30, closed)

I understsnd MSG contains a lot of salt.
The point is it's a 'better' flavour enhancer than salt. You need less of it to make shit food taste good. As a general rule food flavoured with MSG tends to have an overall lower salt content than food that is flavoured with just salt.

Also, salt isn't all bad. It's an important part of ones diet. If you had no salt you would die.
( The Awful Puppy Bakery is still bored, Sat 1 Oct 2011, 5:02, closed)

MSG?
Some counter-examples I wouldn't have thought of. MSG might contribute to shortening your life, but a fan will kill you in your sleep. There's quite a big difference there. I have no qualms about knocking on fan death.

Also, creationism is dumb, but it isn't a gadget.
(racetraitor has an alibi for, Sun 2 Oct 2011, 4:29, closed)