I need some help with a conspiracy theory, so where better than the home of nutjobbs.
Why the shuddering fuck are the police being so reticent in the phone hacking case. Namely doing there damndest to keep the targets of phone hacking secret. There's a can of worms here somewhere just don't know what it is.
( Ring Of Fire A petty, drooling belming butthurt retard., Sun 23 Jan 2011, 13:17, 8 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

*dons tinfoil hat*

( girlinthehole, Sun 23 Jan 2011, 13:40, Reply)

*puts oven on*

( Ring Of Fire A petty, drooling belming butthurt retard., Sun 23 Jan 2011, 13:45, Reply)

Because if the targets knew they were targets, they would use someone else's phone.
dur.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Sun 23 Jan 2011, 13:43, Reply)

their

( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Sun 23 Jan 2011, 15:14, Reply)

Yes.
Never mind though, thinking's not his strong point.
( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Sun 23 Jan 2011, 16:25, Reply)

Because the Metropolitan Police have always had a cosy relationship with The News Of The World.
NOTW hacks write stories with police-positive spin, serving and ex-officers provide them with tip-offs about busts about to happen so that they get exclusive scoops etc.
Private Eye did a very good piece about it before xmas.
( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Sun 23 Jan 2011, 16:24, Reply)

What I'd like to know
is why the likes of Gordon Brown have the effrontery to get his knickers in a twist when it was his government which rushed through the digital economy bill and intrusive legislature. The hypocritical, bung eyed cunt.
(SpunkyMcSpunkbubble Diddled your nubbin on, Sun 23 Jan 2011, 19:41, Reply)

Because that bill was purely to allow intrusiveness by the State.
NOT by members of the press.
( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Sun 23 Jan 2011, 20:00, Reply)