Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Are based on facts and calculated risks. It has nothing to do with discrimination, it just looks that way.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:11, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
they are made up, on a case by case basis.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:13, Reply)
See above. A range of risk factors which apply to the driver in question.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:18, Reply)
I know exactly how it works, but I'm saying insurance companies aren't allowed to use education, intelligence, race etc to compile premiums so why should they be allowed to use sex? it's still unfair.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:17, Reply)
I genuinely think it's a very important point. And in most areas (not all, granted, but most) where women are discriminated against they have at least methods of recourse. This has just been an arbitrary punishment for being born with a cock for about 15 years now.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:22, Reply)
Just as a contributory part of one of the risk profiles.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:19, Reply)
Messrs Singh, Patel and N'kumu are unlikely to be Klansmen.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:25, Reply)
Surely this is wrong also?
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:26, Reply)
without a trace of "jellied eel"
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 9:30, Reply)
You aren't born with an address. Also, if the area you live in has high car theft, that's not something you can effect one way or another. Every car is at more or less equal risk. Whereas not all men drive like cunts.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 10:01, Reply)
I think we can all agree the internet has won again.
(, Tue 1 Mar 2011, 10:02, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread