Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
after that delightful civilised demo at the weekend?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:05, 4 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:06, Reply)
I heard someone was rolled through the windows of Topshop
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:09, Reply)
Or the one where just a few hundred had a riot because they were cunts?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:11, Reply)
Those ones?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:12, Reply)
how can i argue with you seriously when your own spelling and grammar shows that any public money spent on your education was wasted...
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:16, Reply)
and mash your breasts into the keyboard while moaning about how unfair it is that you have to pay taxes.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:19, Reply)
i don't LIKE paying tax. i would rather spend it and contribute to the economy that way. but i appreciate it is a necessary evil.
all i have ever said is this: if i am going to get butt-raped for £3,000 of tax a month, i think the government spunks it up the wall and it could be better spent. i don't really see how even you can disagree with this!
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:28, Reply)
Can't stand in the way of politics *sharpens kukri*
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:20, Reply)
that because of the march the goverment is BOUND to reverse 'there' policy. Oh, sorry, hang on, what I meant to say was 'the whole thing was completely fucking pointless and achieved precisely sod fucking all, cost London businesses hundreds of grand and the taxpayer hundreds of thousands more - probably the salaries of literally hundreds of teachers, a load of wheelchairs or whatever, and was therefore a fucking disgrace'.
I always get those two mixed up, sorry.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:22, Reply)
What size does a demonstration have to be for the act of the Government ignoring the protests to be seen as going against the will of the people?
(playing Devil's Advocate here somewhat, my viewpoint is not contained in the question)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:26, Reply)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:27, Reply)
that if enough people are unhappy with the way their country is being run then they should attend an election and vote for a party that presents a method of government that they prefer.
Sorry, I meant 'set fire to Boots'.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:30, Reply)
But that aside, you believe that people should wait up to four years to deal with what's happening right now? That people can only have the power to enact change as often as there are Olympic games?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:35, Reply)
then why not organise an (equally pointless) online petition or something that is
a) free, and available to the population wherever they live
b) environmentally sound and
c) doesn't waste huge swathes of public and private money to deal with at a time when no-one's fucking got any
The idea of displaying the numbers of disgruntled voters still happens, but without the rioting. A civilised solution.
I put it to you, though, that for the vast majority of the public the penny has fucking dropped that yes, it's not great, but actually we as a nation have no fucking money and this needs dealing with and fast.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:46, Reply)
Have you considered that those marching are not necessarily against cuts being made, rather against the target of those cuts whilst other areas go untouched?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:51, Reply)
who fancied a bit of a day out and possible RHUMBLE - like our contributor here, whose childish glee at the prospect of a riot was plain for all to see.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:53, Reply)
a few hundred out of half a million. Something like less than 1% of the people that actually went on the march.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:55, Reply)
It only takes the existence of one tosser amongst a group for there to be a 'proportion'.
Yes the rioters undermine the demonstration, but 149 charges for 250,000-500,000 people means it's a very small percentage.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:58, Reply)
I am not excluding myself from this number.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 11:05, Reply)
the ones I heard (while possibly a minority) were strongly suggesting that they were against all of the cuts on principle, not just particular targets.
Nothing against people protesting, but they could at least put some fucking thought into why.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:54, Reply)
Apologies if it came across that way.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:59, Reply)
I was saying that a lot of people were just against all the cuts equally, with no real thought as to why.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 11:02, Reply)
We are not a bankrupt nation, we have a large amount of borrowing which was needed to deal with a worldwide recession. Thanks to the massive sudden cuts we are now not a growing economy, in the last quarter of last year we were a shrinking economy. We cannot possibly pay back our borrowing with a shrinking economy.
It's stupidly simplistic to say "There's no money"
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:53, Reply)
and a dwindling manufacturing sector - and widespread gigantic wastage throughout the public sector that should have been dealt with fucking decades ago?
I sold some chairs to London Borough of Tower Hamlets last year - each one cost over £100 when you can get an office chair for about £15 from Viking - a grotesque and indefensible waste of public money, and somewhat symbolic. I think at the very least holiday allowances, sick pay and pensions should be brought into line with the private sector. My sister was a civil servant for over 5 years and had incredible benefits, and reported to me that there were so, so many pointless managers and positions that were totally unnecessary. They should be cut whether we as a nation have money or not, and there are fucking loads of them. Advisory committees etc - just fucking hot air jobs that do nothing for anyone.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 11:02, Reply)
Also, lets once again go back to the fact that if you have these opinions then you should exercise your right to vote and the fact that your refusal to do so totally undermines any argument you make, particularly the one that said that any sort of protest is pointless and people should just wait until the next election.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 11:06, Reply)
who worked on the inside for several years and was disgusted by what she saw? I should point out that she is also a fucking mug who thought that Labour getting in was the dawn of a new fucking era - and then bought your mate Clegg's bullshit at the last one too.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 11:10, Reply)
causing a government policy reversal are almost certainly nil.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:42, Reply)
Because events around the world would suggest otherwise.
If there came a point when a demonstration populated and supported by the majority of the public (not saying that this is the case with the anti-cuts marches) did not sway Government decision making then could you not argue that the UK was no longer under democratic rule?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:48, Reply)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:52, Reply)
Egypt was a demonstration, not an armed revolution.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:53, Reply)
so your opinion is entirely worthless.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:26, Reply)
the country has run out of money. how about this novel idea: maybe if you got a better job and paid more tax instead of wasting your time marching along waving bits of cardboard about your entitlement to get stuff out of a bankrupt state system, the country would have more money to spend on the important things like schools and the NHS.
where is our favourite little protestor anyway? too busy shagging her bf to care about politics like all good feminists probably.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:26, Reply)
if your principles are so fucking important, why hide behind a mask?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:28, Reply)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:30, Reply)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:34, Reply)
and if people wanted to have a big demonstration in favour of destroying all prospects of growth and the backdoor privatisation of the NHS then they would be perfectly within their rights to do so.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:28, Reply)
if every single one of those protestors had donated a day's salary to the NHS instead, it would have raised well over £500,000. how many nurses would that pay for a year?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:30, Reply)
Still where there's a hole there's a goal
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:29, Reply)
i drank my way through oxford from thu-sun and i couldn't drink the memory away.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:31, Reply)
I wouldn't want to be in the adjoining coach seat to that for several hours
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:37, Reply)
And their staff are STILL getting paid. No protestor could possibly use such a service.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:40, Reply)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:31, Reply)
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:41, Reply)
Partly because you post more than anyone else, as is well documented, and have restrained yourself thus far, but mostly for "prancing poof"
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:43, Reply)
although gets worse when lying down. Surfing yesterday was good for it I am sure.
Weekend was great, thanks for asking.
How about you?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:44, Reply)
Looked at mattresses. Pulled up nettles. I am officially middle-aged.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:47, Reply)
by hurting myself on trampolines, staying up stupidly late and various other silly things.
It doesn't seem to be working. My mrs claims she found some grey hairs on my head.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:49, Reply)
I won't ask how you know this as I don't want to know.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:32, Reply)
Another bad strike against the internet
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:35, Reply)
Last bankers' bonuses demonstration they had there, he and his compatriots photocopied some money and threw huge stacks of these photocopied bills out of the windows at the protestors.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:25, Reply)
'they were all suddenly wracked with remorse for their greedy ways, and immediately donated their bonuses to charity when they saw a load of smelly students walking down the streets carrying placards (displaying misspelt and horribly embarrassing slogans about 'Bliar' etc.) and bellowing inflammatory gibberish into megaphones'.
That's what you mean, isn't it?
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:28, Reply)
and then had them arrested for entering the premesis without permission.
(, Mon 28 Mar 2011, 10:30, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread