
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:28, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)

I gather the anti arguement is
- One Person One Vote
- £250m to impliment
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:34, Reply)

Everyone gets the same number of votes under AV, and it won't cost £250 million.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:36, Reply)

Parties who are anti: think they'll do worse under the system
Parties who are pro: think they'll do better under the system
The rest is bollocks.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:39, Reply)

I guess the One Vote One Person thing is wrong, I mean, the point of their arguement there... 'cus it's still everyone getting the same. It's like instead of everyone getting a matleeser to give to the girl they like, they get a packet and can hedge their bets.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:40, Reply)

... so that's quite a compliment.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:48, Reply)

democracy is expensive but some things are worth paying for.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:44, Reply)

My mate Yeti was once offered a blowjob off a crack whore in Shoreditch... for £6.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:47, Reply)

( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:56, Reply)

Mind you, it's probably because it's a bit more specialised then for teh women. Anyone can get their vadge pounded, but only some men have "what it takes"
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 17:05, Reply)

Apparently she was quite persistent, until he explained to her that he'd only just moved into the area, didn't even have £6 on him and was looking to get something to eat with the £2.75 he had left and nothing personal, love, but he wasn't interested.
Her reply?
"I'll give you one for £2.75."
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:56, Reply)

"Awww MAN ! What do you mean Chips are £1.10 ? "
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 17:02, Reply)

you have to either pay people to count the votes, or you invest in electronic vote counting machines. But you will need the same whichever system you use.
The main point is that cost should not be a factor when considering the most democratic method of electing politicians.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:44, Reply)

Yeh', I agree. Like for example, I'm supposed to get a double-dose of some stuff called Inflixnab/Remicade, been waiting for it for 3 months now, and because of finances, they haven't said yes or no yet. But I can only have the stuff every 2 months, and if I don't get my next dose next week, I risk becoming imume and the stuff not working at all ever again. I was waiting 'till they tell me yes/no, but if I wait longer than next week then the risk is so high, that we're just going to go with a normal dose and next time (in 2 months) I'll hopefully have a dessision.
But yeah', money shouldn't affect these things.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:54, Reply)

but if she doesn't put out they can take it back and give it to the next one down the list, until either they finally get one who will put out or the girls get too ugly for them to bother.
( , Fri 15 Apr 2011, 16:49, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread