b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1184646 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Plan B, Dan Le Sac, Dizzy Rascle.

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:02, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Utter, utter shit, never heard him, but assume he's certainly shit, and just shit.

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:09, Reply)
How can someone who rhymed
"I stab you in the eye yo', with a fucking biro, the same biro, you used sign your gyro, you fucking wino, best step back or you'll get blood on your nikes bro' "

be shit?
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:19, Reply)
Hahaha that's quality.

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:23, Reply)
None of them has bad Germanic poodle perms so Al won't be interested in them.
None wears tights either. You're wasting your time.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:10, Reply)
Oh man, you totally zinged me there
by pointing out that one technically gifted guitarist is a massive cunt who once fell into a swimming pool while carrying out a telephone interview.

Totally undermines my point about all the above artists being shit and talentless.

Totally.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:16, Reply)
I suspect that a lot of the most technically gifted guitarists are massive cunts
not sure why, but it just strikes me that Steve Vai is probably a wanker
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:17, Reply)
I get the impression that Joe Satriani
has become less of a pretentious twat as time has gone on.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:19, Reply)
This is right.
I've read interviews with him from the last year or two and he seems remarkably sound.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:21, Reply)
he's certainly producing some less wanky music
some of the Chickenfoot stuff isn't too bad
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:22, Reply)
That's the thing about guitarists
they need to realise that they ought to be part of a bands structure, not the entire focus of the band.

You would do well to take note.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:23, Reply)
I am so not the focus of my band
you are right though.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:24, Reply)
The focus of your band is its shit name.
Deal with it, please.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:26, Reply)
I've tried
it's not happening.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:28, Reply)
I shall compose a short essay on why they should, if you like.
It may contain expletives, though.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:29, Reply)
I'm tempted to ask you to do this for my entertainment anyway
I don't think it would work with the band though. They don't quite understand.

arguments were like
"we've got a following" - yeah, but it's only our friends and some people we know from the pub
"we've got two cds out" - they're not 'out', and they are frankly a bit shit

still didn't work. The trouble is, most of the band aren't horrible music snobs like you and I
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:32, Reply)
You poor sod.

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:44, Reply)
I know...

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:47, Reply)
The same applies to singers who often think of the band as their backing band.
Don't they, AXL ROSE?
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:25, Reply)
Very true

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:30, Reply)
axl would totally have got it in the 80s though
well, if i hadn't been about 8.

not now though. his scary plastic face scares me.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:35, Reply)
You need to use your illusion.

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:36, Reply)
Ritchie Blackmore certainly has a reputation for being "difficult."

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:20, Reply)
"A little touchy"
might be the best way to describe him
(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:22, Reply)
'Medieval gaylord' might be slightly better.

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:24, Reply)
he's a nutter

(, Thu 28 Apr 2011, 10:23, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1