Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
it's cheaper and easier to just kill people. Most people, I would argue, don't think things through and are no good at ethics/philosophy
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:32, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:34, Reply)
I suspect a lot would say "no...but there are ocassions..."
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:35, Reply)
When I ask if they would be able to kill a 10 year old boy they respond well they should have waited until they were 18 and then have killed them. Like that makes any sense. I still think only idiots want it back.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:37, Reply)
as that was when it happened. someone in the class suggested putting signs around their necks saying "i killed jamie bulger" and sending them into the middle of liverpool...
i do remember the comment of denise bulger: "i knew where my little boy was all the time. why didn't their parents? if they had, it wouldn't have happened."
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:43, Reply)
That's some pretty high class neglect, right there.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:45, Reply)
and they said "They found him" Any grown adult should have said "I'll take him to the police station" or something not just let two ten year olds take him off
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:45, Reply)
they knew full well what they were doing was Wrong. my 18 month old niece knows it's wrong when she hits her older brother and sister with a toy, ffs! it's not like they were being asked to debate criminal jurisprudence, but they certainly knew that hurting and killing a younger boy was an evil and a wicked thing to do.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:47, Reply)
But I still think that the mother could have prevented it by knowing where her kid was and this woman could have prevented it by taking them to the police. I also think the death penalty for two 10 year old boys is too much in an apparently progressive society.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:49, Reply)
"It's cheaper than keeping them locked up" is not an argument for the death penalty.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:37, Reply)
to keep those who raped and butchered terrified small children safe from being attacked by other prisoners. some of them might live another 50 years. how many schools could you build with that money? how many hospital beds? how many nurses'/doctors' salaries? how much aid could we give to somalia, for example? are these people worth it?
YOU decide!
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:41, Reply)
We can't let these towel heads think they can get away with all being terrorists because we are paying too much on our prison and rehabilitation system!
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:46, Reply)
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:49, Reply)
"People have the right to life" and then punish those that break this rule by breaking it yourself.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:47, Reply)
like brady, with his starvation protest, and huntley, with his suicide attempts?
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:48, Reply)
you were talking about us as a people killing other people that we don't like.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:49, Reply)
Anyone who wants to die should have that right in my opinion but no-one should be able to choose who lives and dies.
I think bin laden should have been captured and tried, I don't think any administration should have the right to say "We want him dead, kill him"
Also the death penalty is a crap punishment, it only punishes the people that care about the criminal. If you killed me I wouldn't be around to give a shit.
(, Thu 4 Aug 2011, 16:52, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread