Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
we did nine GCSEs. Now they seem to be doing 11. And spending less time in lessons. Either kids today are genii, or the exams aren't as indepth as they used to be.
/old lady moaning
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:14, 3 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
lol anal sex etc.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:15, Reply)
Say, 40 years ago,the ratio of clever:average:thick was 15:70:15, whereas today its more like 30:40:30, and the top 30% are the quieter types, so the thicko band get noticed more by adults.
So the pass rate is rising, but there are also more thick kids. So there probably are more genii, we're just being obscured to a greater degree.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:19, Reply)
Teaching is improving, but only in the sense that you're being taught better how to pass an exam.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:23, Reply)
there's less indepth knowledge of a subject and the exams are definitely easier.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:24, Reply)
Apart from one C in of the more mocked subjects.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:26, Reply)
but you're better trained how to do it.
I don't think there is any way of measuring peoples common sense though, which is something that is far more important in a working environment.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:26, Reply)
and the idea of these was to set a simple-looking but inherently complex problem, make the candidates figure out how to solve it themselves, and use the question to test the candidates' problem-solving skills. But because these questions often led to low marks, they are becoming increasingly rare.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:31, Reply)
our teachers did that joke thing of giving us past papers from quite a few years before and they were substantially harder than the ones we had.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:37, Reply)
or covering slightly different things, that you hadn't been taught how to address.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:43, Reply)
the papers certainly seemed harder, and I was relatively smart.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:46, Reply)
but as I said, when you look at older papers set under a slightly different curiculum they appear "hard" to me, because I hadn't learnt how to answer those questions. Had I been taught how to answer those questions I doubt I would have found them hard.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:50, Reply)
My motivation and behaviour were even worse.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:32, Reply)
I did 'O' levels.
It's been a long time since I was a nipper.
EDIT - and I passed an 11 plus and got into grammar school.
This education helps me select a suitable zimmer frame.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:28, Reply)
Cumbria was the last county to move to the Comprehensive system, and I was the last year to do 11 plus.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:34, Reply)
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:38, Reply)
With Grammars and Secondary Moderns and stuff?
Thought that went out with Callaghan.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:39, Reply)
What does it entail? I've no kids myself, so I don't know.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:44, Reply)
Then move to, shall we say, a preferential stream of education?
I'm not being disengenious here - this is something that I've no knowledge of.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:51, Reply)
my grammar school was full of foaming retards, but that's because the whole county was. Same amount of money allocated, but the general theory is that by ability streaming people are less likely to get frustrated at being held back for the slow.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:53, Reply)
As I say, I've no invested interest in the question.
I'd just assumed that since my schooling in the early '80's nothing had changed and it was simply a question of "you live here - you go to this school unless you can pay for something better."
Thanks
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 21:02, Reply)
that still do grammars. I went to a grammar school for a couple of years
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:42, Reply)
They gave me 45 minutes to do it, and I was finished in about 20.
(, Thu 25 Aug 2011, 20:32, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread