Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Which is why I was pleased. I wanted to get a time below two and a half hours, but near the end I thought I wouldn't as I was getting slower and slower, but it turns out we'd gone fast enough near the start to make up for it.
So I was pleased.
Christ, do people always have to explain everything to you in such a level of detail?
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:06, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
"I was initially hoping we would get a sub 2.5 hour time, but in the last three miles I threw all hope of that out the window"
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:10, Reply)
BGB: Acceptable time?
Me: Yes [it was an acceptable time], 2hr26min [the acceptable time] I didn't think I would do it that fast [explanation of why I was pleased with my acceptable time] I had thrown out all hope of getting that time [further information that although I had wanted a sub 2.5hour time during the last three miles I thought I couldn't possibly make it]
I thought CHCB was lying to me [yet more information as to why I thought I couldn't possibly achieve sub 2.5hours which is why achieving it was so pleasing to me]
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:19, Reply)
thus rendering your statement contradictory at best.
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:22, Reply)
It's just that, as a high flying academic, one would expect you to be able to understand the obvious implications which I highlighted above.
The fact that I started off with my actual finishing time, the "key point" if you will, is what clearly indicates that the remaining information was designed to inform why I didn't think I was going to achieve this.
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:32, Reply)
As a "high flying academic" (whatever one of those is) part of my job is to teach people to express information clearly and without ambiguity. I'm sure I could recommend someone more geographically convenient who could provide this service to you?
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:37, Reply)
doesn't mean it fails to inform.
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:39, Reply)
"I was initially hoping we would get a sub 2.5 hour time, but in the last three miles I threw all hope of that out the window."
Are you foreign, or just a mong?
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:30, Reply)
Since I stated what I did actually achieve, the following comment was a reason why I was surprised and pleased with the result.
Which is why you are the mong.
And probably a forrin to boot.
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:33, Reply)
with learning difficulties.
It is therefore not the fault of the reader when they cannot make head nor tail of it.
You flid.
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:39, Reply)
Would have made more sense as:
We did it in 2hour 26minutes and 1 second. I was initially hoping we would get a sub 2.5 hour time.
In the last three miles I threw all hope of that out the window, but CHCB kept telling me we were still on track for less than 2.5 hours. I thought she was just lying to make me feel better.
I'm sure an edit and a personal apology gazzed to Mighto and Fisty would clear this whole sorry mess up.
(, Mon 12 Sep 2011, 10:43, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread