b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1358651 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread


fortyshadesofgrey.blogspot.com/
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:34, 4 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
STOP IT

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:35, Reply)
lawl

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:35, Reply)
I thought she were the fat horrible troll tied up to that gyppo gate, but it appears that she's sat on her fat twat claiming benefits in Bristol whilst fighting for the sisterhood

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:35, Reply)
I was reading about this girl in the papers on the way home from work today, it it might have been on the way too, I can't remember. It was today though.
Anyway, I think her name was Natasha Fox, and she's always going around these protests sticking her big fucking fanny in because she got the horse she really wanted growing up, or something like that.

Anyway, I was on the side of the Dale Farm people until all these fucking activists stuck their awe in, can't fucking stand them.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:46, Reply)
They were told when they bought the land that they weren't allowed to build permanent homes on it
but they still did it anyway. Then they bitch and whine about being turned out of their homes, as if they're being robbed of their ancient family homesteads.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:50, Reply)
You do know that they have 'houses' back in Ireland.
They quite like the double drop of benefits from both States
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:54, Reply)
Pikey bastards.
*subscribes to Daily Mail*
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:56, Reply)
Only reason it was revoked was due to greenbelt issues, which I strongly disagree with, within the UK.

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:58, Reply)
A load of middle class 'warriors of the proletariat' have turned up to defend the gyppos human rights
Not that the knackers had any credibility to begin with. I do hope mummy and daddys house in Buckinghamshire will have their driveway Tarmacadamed by their new found bredren.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:53, Reply)
Besides, as we all know, the only people who have human rights are burglars and rapists.

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:56, Reply)
*rustles the daily mail*

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 20:57, Reply)
There's a post on that blog about arguments I will never have again.
The authors writes:

"Only 6.5% of reported rapes will result in a conviction of the attacker."


in August 2011.

This oft-quoted 'fact' comes from a misconstured AG's report from 2007-2008 and has actually led to a decrease in the number of rapes reported as people (quite understandably, if the 6.5% figure were correct) didn't think there was any point reporting it.

In actual fact the number of convictions at court is around 60%, which is very close to the average conviction rate, which frankly is quite staggering, given ultimately how hard it is to prove the requisite elements of a rape. By comparison, the lowest rate of conviction in court is (this is from memory now) Threat to kill which is around the 50% mark.

I think if you google it you can probably find the debates in the commons on Hansard where Lady Stern tears a strip off Harman and demands that the 6% figure 'never be used', as it is wrong and misleading.

Wrong and misleading, like that blog post.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:37, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1