b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1369516 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Without prejudice to what?
The employee will have a field day at a tribunal for an instant dismissal with no hearing or right of appeal. Sounds like 'The Luggage' has cobbled together statements that he's heard and has regurgitated it on an internet message board as 'Gospel'. Who'd have thought that eh, another clueless wanker on the internet.
(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 12:52, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
A quick google tells me that "An employee may be terminated without prejudice, meaning the fired employee may be rehired readily for the same or a similar job in the future."
This doesn't seem appropriate for sacking someone who physically threatened another member of staff...
(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 12:55, Reply)
Unless they are a boxer

(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 12:57, Reply)
I don't see how dogs can threaten to stab people.

(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 12:58, Reply)
Guns don't kill people, boxers do
I saw it in a documentary on BBC2
(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 13:00, Reply)
'A quick google' = talking out of your arse
A bilateral agreement to end a contract of employment, subject to the possibility of a further contract on the whim of an employer doesn't really cover being sacked with immediate effect does it.
(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 13:09, Reply)
Well, I simply copied and pasted that note from above.
However, 'when a lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice, it signifies that none of the rights or privileges of the individual involved are considered to be lost or waived', so I would assume that dismissal without prejudice goes down the same lines.

Also, notice that I agreed that this seems inappropriate.
(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 13:16, Reply)
Fuck's sakes, taking the internet far too seriously you are.
I wasn't involved, just a witness, and the guy who was fired was in fact a temp. Sorry for the lack of clarification.
(, Tue 27 Sep 2011, 13:23, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1