b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1377589 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Medically it's wiser to have kids earlier.
It's also wiser not to smoke or drink when pregnant and to have a good diet, all of this is good advice but no reason to make it law. There is also the emotional/financial aspect. Physically women may be best able to have l=kids at 18/20 but what 18 year old has the sense to raise a child well, let alone the cash, I reckon it all evens out in the end.
(, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:34, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
I'd say 16 is the maximum age they should concieve.
And they should all get council accomodation out of our taxes.
(, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:37, Reply)
This is another way to deal with it.
Early, subsidised, pregnancy kick the brats out to have there own kids when they are 16 and you are 32 and then you can have your life to your self. It would work, not sure how healthy the kids would be emotionally, but physically they'd probably be fine.
(, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:41, Reply)
Then make them pay back all the benefits they've had from the
excellent jobs they will no doubt all occupy.
(, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:46, Reply)
The governemnt will pay me £20 a week to spend on my crotch fruit
I shall use it to feed her gruel and dress her in sack cloth
(, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:53, Reply)
It's the only way she'll learn.

(, Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:54, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1