b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1397777 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

my learned commie friend is correct
if i walk out within 45 mins, i can bill £332 plus VAT and disbursements.

if it lasts 5 hours, i can bill £2,075 plus VAT and disbs.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 9:55, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
Ohhh.... Disbursements! Of course!
*is still none the wiser*
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 9:57, Reply)
it's expenses that aren't advice related
photocopying, counsel's fees, travel to court, taxis, food, legal process server's fees, court fees etc etc.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:02, Reply)
So do you charge for expenses as well as disbs?

(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:04, Reply)
She charges for fucking everything, you can bet on it.

(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:08, Reply)
It's amazing
lawyers don't eat normally, apparently. That can be the only justifiable reason for food being an "expense"
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:09, Reply)
if you have a mediation
so you have a room for your clients, a room for the other side and their lawyers, and a room for the mediator, that is 3 x lunch. now we are a fancy city firm. we're not talking a pikey packet of prawn mayo. we're talking a proper catered buffet.

someone gotta pay for that shit!

obviously i don't charge for lunches if i am not actually in a meeting and spending money on the client...
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:12, Reply)
I know it's the way the game is played
but I'm fairly sure when my company lays on lunch for a client they don't actually charge them for it.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:13, Reply)
we don't always bill it
every case is different
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:23, Reply)
Only when the clients are penniless orphans, innit?

(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:40, Reply)
Anyone would think that one or both of us had been through a bitter divorce
or other costly legal proceeding based on the tone of this conversation.

Where as actually my divorce was amicable with not a lawyer in sight and the only time I've been in a court was as an observer.
(, Thu 20 Oct 2011, 10:12, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1