If the girls
She was finger banging were 15 though it would still be statutory, wouldnt it?

The "victims" just dont want to admit they are fish lovers
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:24, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

nope. not unless they were 13
Might be unlawful but I think they are only claiming assault because they were lied to. Which would make 78% of adults entering a sexual relationship guilty of assault, by my maths
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:27, Reply)

maths defence team
( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:28, Reply)

they were fucking useless
I told them to use the chewbacca defence.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:33, Reply)

Is it 13 for clam munchers
that seems somewhat unfair to regular nonces.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:29, Reply)

no, it's only rape in cases where consent is given if one party is under 13
for both sexes. 13-16 is unlawful activity with a minor but not rape or assault.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:32, Reply)

you sound suspiciously clued-up on this, old bean

( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:49, Reply)

recent background reading after those norfolk/suffolk fuckers
who were filmed spitroasting an 11 year old got reduced sentences because she "looked 14"
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:51, Reply)

Justice for ya, right there.
She wasn't a virgin either.
(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:53, Reply)

I can actually see why it happened, legally.
It's just ..... ffs, she was 11.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:54, Reply)

How do you get that wrong unless you don't care?

(Set your faces to Stunned Bigly, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:57, Reply)

there's no answer to that.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:58, Reply)

sorry, that was a worryingly serious answer
"because I like to be sure I'm not going back to the Scrubs soon"

is that better?
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:54, Reply)

how about "because i'm a horndog pervert"?
simple, accurate, easy.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 15:59, Reply)

and far too close to the truth.
except "horndog"? ffs, swipe, have you accidentally been contaminated with college yank?
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 16:01, Reply)

i was just trying to get down with the (11 year old) kids

( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 16:06, Reply)

as opposed to "going down" on them like some horndogs around here

( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 5 Mar 2012, 16:06, Reply)