b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1669109 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

My all time favourite one
is when it became apparent that I had signed off the printing of 250,000 catalogues, containing a photo which under a magnifying glass clearly showed two magazine files used as props, which were labelled 'CHILD PORN' and 'LAWSUITS'.

LOL.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:05, 5 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
I remember this

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:07, Reply)
LOL YOU SHIT EMPLOYEE.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:07, Reply)
^ YET MORE BULLYING.
What have I done to deserve your singling me out for this relentless cyber-bullying?
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:08, Reply)
Did you get in trouble for this?

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:11, Reply)
Luckily my boss wasn't so cretinously simplistic
as to blame a single person for it.

cf the Iraq war
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:16, Reply)
LOL!!!!!

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:16, Reply)
Oh man, that's hilarious.
Of course you realise that as the person who signed it off, it does actually rest on your shoulders, no matter how much you want this not to be the case.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:23, Reply)
He blamed the stylist.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:35, Reply)
She admitted the other day that you'd done nothing.
She rolled a dice, your name came up. She's just being a relentless harridan.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:13, Reply)
Hmmmm never been described as a harridan before....
I think I like it. But I'm not sure.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:32, Reply)
YOU JUST ANNOY ME.
You with your PONYTAIL and your getting the HOT GIRL and your SAMURAI SWORDSD and your MASSIVE DRUGS. I mean FUCK, why can't I have a life that good?!
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:14, Reply)
We can't all be life's winners like me.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:17, Reply)
The strikethrough is too obvious. I can't be bothered.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:28, Reply)
were you going to change Winners to Weiners?

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:30, Reply)
Allow me....
w s
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:34, Reply)
I'm sure you can have a ponytail.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:30, Reply)
I do have one. But it's not cool

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:30, Reply)
Comfort yourself by knowing his will fall out in the next few years.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:31, Reply)
AWESOME.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:34, Reply)
lolz

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:07, Reply)
we just released a widely distributed response paper.
The external copywriters used the phrase 'bi-polar', which I made them change to 'polarised'.

FFS.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:09, Reply)
Is this you "big" problem?

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:10, Reply)
No.
It was just lolsome. The regulator have no cause to contact me about that. It's outside their remit.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:13, Reply)
They'll see right through this now

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:10, Reply)
It's a "glaring" mistake.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:14, Reply)
Fish for someone to blame

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:17, Reply)
Closest we've come to this was a client with ROI and UK paper, with the relevant currency printed on each
It had been approved by the customer, but I noticed that on the ROI one it used both £ and €. My boss was unsure, so decided to check it with the client. Turns out this was incorrect, and as a result, we managed to NOT fuck up 100,000 carriers.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:11, Reply)
Cool story.
won't put 'bro' if it's all the same, I don't Rory to start on me the way he does with you.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:14, Reply)
Rory only has a go at people who he thinks he can get away with it.
have a go back. It's fun.
(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:15, Reply)
Tbh, it was fucking obvious, how it wasn't spotted it beyond me.

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:15, Reply)
FUCK YEAH!

(, Wed 11 Jul 2012, 13:24, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1