b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1705421 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

A levels are merely an entrance to Uni
Now that they are charging £9K a year, I'll bet most lower their entry grades anyway as less people can afford to go.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:36, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Fewer, darling.

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:52, Reply)
Proof that educational standards have been suffering since at least the early 90s

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:54, Reply)
I only started school in the early 90s, so that's obviously bollocks too.
I think a lot of the problem is down to parents expecting schools to do all the work and taking no responsibility for their kids not being thick cunts. My mum taught me to read and write before I started school, and I think that helped considerably.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 9:58, Reply)
I was referring to sporto, not you.
Your mum taught me a thing or two as well.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:00, Reply)
...and me

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:02, Reply)
It'll likely be quicker to list the people who haven't shagged my mum.

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:03, Reply)
We've had this argument on here before
"less" can replace "fewer" but "fewer" can not replace "less". It's a modern, but acceptable usage.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:00, Reply)
Except that fewer was the correct term.
Fewer is discrete, less is continuous.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:01, Reply)
Don't start this off again
Kroney will start speaking in Old English soon.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:03, Reply)
If you have a group of people, and some leave, there are fewer people.
If you have one person and cut their leg off, there's less person. That is how it works, no exceptions, fuck Kroney and his retard ways.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:05, Reply)
I'm on your side on this one, Deddo.
But this has been debated at great length on these pages several times.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)
I think I love you BraynDedd.

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 11:34, Reply)
"Was" being the operative word, I'm afraid.

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:05, Reply)
Look, I'm all for the English language adapting and evolving, that is the beauty of it.
What I'm not okay with is changing it to accommodate the stupid.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)
I didn't say I liked it, I said it was acceptable.
Using your example, it's something to do with a group of people being a crowd and so if you remove part of that crowd, there's less crowd left. Language drift, rather than lack of education.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:11, Reply)
No, that would be fine under my idea of the rules too.
Less crowd, fewer people composing said crowd. The crowd is a single thing, the people are not.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:13, Reply)
Yeah, I know what you mean. For the most part I agree with you.
I'm just saying that the rules aren't as rigid as that anymore.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:16, Reply)
They should be though, we make too many allowances for thickos.

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:17, Reply)
They don't even teach correct spelling anymore.
Grammar's a lost hope.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:18, Reply)
Which is why we are sending her to Switzerland.

(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:20, Reply)
not a chance.
Well, not the proper Unis anyway. We've just put ours up 2 years in a row and we're still at least 4 times oversubscribed.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:21, Reply)
i was looking at our interview list
only a handful of unis across all interviewees: oxbridge, manchester, warwick, bristol, edinburgh, durham and london. that was it. and we had over 100 applicants per place. employers get snobby when too much choice.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 10:23, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1