b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1923823 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

not at all.
The opposite. Most chancellors, even those economically qualified and skilled, take their advice from the Treasury. Osborne refuses to on a number of key issues because "he and the conservative party know better"

So not only can he, economically, not find his arse with both hands, but he refuses to take advice from the people who are specifically employed and ideally skilled to offer him an arse-map and some hand sat-navs.

It's a big part of the reason my missus chose to leave the treasu.... but I'm not supposed to talk about that
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:50, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
well yer, there has to be some 'steerage' on where they're going. But if George wholesale refused to follow their lead there'd bee a lot more leaks on what a fucking prick he is

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:52, Reply)
How many leaks do you need?
Remember the budget before last?
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:53, Reply)
What're you, some kind of Welsh vegetable dealer now are you?

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:55, Reply)
IM SORRY BUT I DONT READ THE LIES IN THE GUARDIAN

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:58, Reply)
You don't need to leak what is common knowledge.

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:54, Reply)
I'd just like to leak that you are a fucking WOMAD Kershaw yurt prick.

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:55, Reply)

www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1923842
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:58, Reply)
Essentially the treasury have to do what they are told
so, Osborne and his team say what they want. The treasury tell them it's idiotic. They ask for it anyway, and the treasury have to work out a way to do it.

Most chancellors defer to the treasury on most things, except key pre-election promises, but obviously the treasury are geared up for that, as in the run-up to elections they work out how the key policies of all the parties would work, just in case they get elected.

Osborne defers on very little, but the treasury's hands are essentially tied. Ultimate decision rests with the chancellor, which is why having a chancellor who is both an economic idiot and unspeakably arrogant is a really, really, fucking bad idea. The fact he's Tory is really neither here nor there, this is apolitical. It's the fact he's George Osborne that is the major problem.
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:58, Reply)
yeah, but he runs a very successful family business. he's got a proven track record, he's not just a career prick in the treasury

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:03, Reply)
yeah but he's just saved us from a triple dip recession so it's all good yeah?

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:54, Reply)
So he's so incompetent it's taken him three goes to massage the figures so they're no longer negative?

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 9:58, Reply)
would you rather someone gave up at the first sign of trouble?

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:01, Reply)
I'd prefer him to think further than the next election
but no politician ever does that, or what's in the country's best interests.
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:05, Reply)
To be fair, he doesn't massage the figures so much as ignores them.
The figures are produced independently.
(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:03, Reply)
To be even fairer, shut up, no-one cares about your worthless vegetarian opinons

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:09, Reply)
Gaz me for recipe tips, yeah?

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:11, Reply)
Put on a black coat and go and lie on the M4 at midnight, yeah?

(, Fri 5 Apr 2013, 10:13, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1