b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1942803 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

It was quite amusing watchig George Osbourne on Channel 4 news last night
being interviewed about this. He was accused by the interviewer of trying to threaten the Scots with this if they didn't vote to stay in the Union.

He then got lambasted for having teh audacity to criticise someone elses economic policy when he's the one that even the IMF think is a twat.

It's a bit tragic when, even when he's actually in the right about something, he still comes across as a clueless fucktard.
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:50, 4 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Something something stopped clock something

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:51, Reply)
...forest moon of Endor
Wait, I'm not getting this right, am I?
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:53, Reply)
Whilst you are almost certainly right, I cannot abide the word 'fucktard' so for that reason, ah'm oot.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:54, Reply)
Fuck off you Gym owning child abuser.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:57, Reply)
unfortunately Gideon thinks the IMF
sang unbelievable
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:58, Reply)
hahaha

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 14:58, Reply)
Really? The IMF employed Emilio Estevez so that's really saying somethin'
/bananaman
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:01, Reply)
spiderman

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:02, Reply)
batman and robin tooooo..

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:03, Reply)
Don't want to lick the knackers of BA Baracus....

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:04, Reply)
GET SOME NUTS

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:05, Reply)
I kill you
man
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:06, Reply)
Infidel etc.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:10, Reply)
Zinfandel.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:13, Reply)
No thanks. I'll have a pinotage or a malbec.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:14, Reply)
For some weird reason I read this as vintage maybach


(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:27, Reply)
Here Monty, you're a language nerd.
I was reading the Wiki on Middle English and it had negative concord, where if you had multiple negatives in a sentence they intensified the negative, rather than cancelling it. So "I've not got nothing" would have been a more linguistically aggressive "I've got nothing".

Interesting, I thought. I vaguely remember reading something that suggested that our propensity towards double negatives wasn't merely bad grammar, but a function of our language and it was Victorian standardisers, who used Latin grammatical rules I believe, who put this idea of multiple negatives being bad into our heads.
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:17, Reply)
Is this the less vs fewer debate all over again?
Were you touched up by a Victorian standardiser or summat?
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:19, Reply)
No that's a different thing.
I just thought this was interesting.
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:19, Reply)
Well you were wrong.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:22, Reply)
This is why I didn't start the post with "Here, Battered".

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:25, Reply)
Most likely.
Go back 300 years and you could spell how the fuck you liked and arse about with grammar all day long and no one gave a shit.
(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:27, Reply)
Wasn't this known as the Gonzian period for that very reason?

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:28, Reply)
I believe so, yes.

(, Wed 24 Apr 2013, 15:29, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1