b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 199784 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

I've just checked the b3ta entry on Wikipedia
I'm no longer mentioned. Nor is Bert or CHCB or Chickenlady or Frank or anyone.

Somebody must dislike us.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:17, 15 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I HATE us

Nah, not really, I'm just kidding. I love you all like I love Jamaica Ginger cake.

YUMMY.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:20, Reply)
Yeah I noticed that as well
Although I wasn't mentioned anyway. But I did like the comment about frank's posts being either highly sexual or in poor taste.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:23, Reply)
Why
does this mystery b3ta-historian feel the need to suggest that frank's posts are often highly sexual in nature OR in poor taste?

I've seen plenty that are both.
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:28, Reply)
AHAHAHA!
Now you are all like me.

*eeevil plaaan*
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:40, Reply)
*scowls at the Eminem*

*holds up crucifix*
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 16:15, Reply)
Fear not Enzyme
go check again for I likes you all :)
(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 18:38, Reply)
*coughs*

(, Tue 15 Jul 2008, 20:13, Reply)
ooo, I get a mention
*wipes away tear and prepares to give speech*

this is so unexpected, I don't know what to say

*shuffles reams of notes*
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 8:58, Reply)
and I don't...
Bah

*Edit*

Yay!
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 9:23, Reply)
@PJM
It appears that you do, now.

Someone has corrected the omission.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 9:30, Reply)
And people accuse you guys of being cliquey
I can't imagine why...
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 12:48, Reply)
^^We are not a clique.
A clique is a group of people who do not accept outsiders into it's bosom. We do accept outsiders if they wish to join in our japery and fun-filled shinannigans.

Just thought I'd clear that up.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:26, Reply)
^
@BGB

I'm not denying most QOTWers are loverly and friendly folk, but surely providing a list of user names on Wikipedia, thereby excluding others (albeit accidentally) is typical cliquey behaviour?

Just a thought...
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:33, Reply)
@Pavlov
I suspect we were named as we use 'offtopic' the most. I doubt whoever listed us there meant that we were a small and select few.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:47, Reply)
^ but
I rarely use the Off Topic board (though I realise this is a self-defeating claim as I'm making it in an off-topic thread).

Anyway, Wikipedia is unreliable by definition. My students aren't allowed to use it as a primary source. The fact that I get material for my lectures from it is neither here nor there...
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 9:51, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1