Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
I've just checked the b3ta entry on Wikipedia
I'm no longer mentioned. Nor is Bert or CHCB or Chickenlady or Frank or anyone.
Somebody must dislike us.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:17, 15 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I'm no longer mentioned. Nor is Bert or CHCB or Chickenlady or Frank or anyone.
Somebody must dislike us.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:17, 15 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I HATE us
Nah, not really, I'm just kidding. I love you all like I love Jamaica Ginger cake.
YUMMY.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:20, Reply)
Nah, not really, I'm just kidding. I love you all like I love Jamaica Ginger cake.
YUMMY.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:20, Reply)
Yeah I noticed that as well
Although I wasn't mentioned anyway. But I did like the comment about frank's posts being either highly sexual or in poor taste.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:23, Reply)
Although I wasn't mentioned anyway. But I did like the comment about frank's posts being either highly sexual or in poor taste.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:23, Reply)
Why
does this mystery b3ta-historian feel the need to suggest that frank's posts are often highly sexual in nature OR in poor taste?
I've seen plenty that are both.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:28, Reply)
does this mystery b3ta-historian feel the need to suggest that frank's posts are often highly sexual in nature OR in poor taste?
I've seen plenty that are both.
( , Tue 15 Jul 2008, 15:28, Reply)
ooo, I get a mention
*wipes away tear and prepares to give speech*
this is so unexpected, I don't know what to say
*shuffles reams of notes*
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 8:58, Reply)
*wipes away tear and prepares to give speech*
this is so unexpected, I don't know what to say
*shuffles reams of notes*
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 8:58, Reply)
@PJM
It appears that you do, now.
Someone has corrected the omission.
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 9:30, Reply)
It appears that you do, now.
Someone has corrected the omission.
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 9:30, Reply)
And people accuse you guys of being cliquey
I can't imagine why...
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 12:48, Reply)
I can't imagine why...
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 12:48, Reply)
^^We are not a clique.
A clique is a group of people who do not accept outsiders into it's bosom. We do accept outsiders if they wish to join in our japery and fun-filled shinannigans.
Just thought I'd clear that up.
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:26, Reply)
A clique is a group of people who do not accept outsiders into it's bosom. We do accept outsiders if they wish to join in our japery and fun-filled shinannigans.
Just thought I'd clear that up.
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:26, Reply)
^
@BGB
I'm not denying most QOTWers are loverly and friendly folk, but surely providing a list of user names on Wikipedia, thereby excluding others (albeit accidentally) is typical cliquey behaviour?
Just a thought...
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:33, Reply)
@BGB
I'm not denying most QOTWers are loverly and friendly folk, but surely providing a list of user names on Wikipedia, thereby excluding others (albeit accidentally) is typical cliquey behaviour?
Just a thought...
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:33, Reply)
@Pavlov
I suspect we were named as we use 'offtopic' the most. I doubt whoever listed us there meant that we were a small and select few.
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:47, Reply)
I suspect we were named as we use 'offtopic' the most. I doubt whoever listed us there meant that we were a small and select few.
( , Wed 16 Jul 2008, 14:47, Reply)
^ but
I rarely use the Off Topic board (though I realise this is a self-defeating claim as I'm making it in an off-topic thread).
Anyway, Wikipedia is unreliable by definition. My students aren't allowed to use it as a primary source. The fact that I get material for my lectures from it is neither here nor there...
( , Thu 17 Jul 2008, 9:51, Reply)
I rarely use the Off Topic board (though I realise this is a self-defeating claim as I'm making it in an off-topic thread).
Anyway, Wikipedia is unreliable by definition. My students aren't allowed to use it as a primary source. The fact that I get material for my lectures from it is neither here nor there...
( , Thu 17 Jul 2008, 9:51, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »