Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
is that it is actually fairly straightforward on a macro scale.
(, Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:51, 3 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
i mean, look at actuaries - they basically predict how much an insurer will have to spend in the next 12 months when it insures itself against losses. that's got to be part science, part fiction.
(, Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:53, Reply)
I studied economics at A Level, and I found the macro side to be incredibly easy to understand. MV=PT etc. It was the micro that I could never get my head round.
Unfortunately, most people don't even think about what it really means. They just believe what the papers tell them, according to their own agenda.
(, Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:54, Reply)
i got my opinion from wikipedia, google and the comments on the daily retard website. IT'S THEREFORE TOTALLY VALID AND ACCURATE.
(, Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:56, Reply)
Every third sentence had the word "assume" in it.
This doesn't lead me to have much faith in economists.
(, Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:58, Reply)
(, Thu 27 Jun 2013, 12:55, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread