
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

I'm unsure if it was decided if The Beatles are shit or not.
I blame Nakers.
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 20:38, 17 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

High end gaming or juicer?
You have ten minutes to decide my evening.
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:38, Reply)

Mate of mine's being sounded out for manager's job at a pub in Cambridge.
Having reccy'd the place it's surrounded by other, better pubs, cheaper and better eateries, there's a a university social club just up the road, the place has no parking despite being on the main road and the brewery owining it are a) cunts and b) being very vague and not very convincing about figures. This is a 'don't fucking go near it' job, right?
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:44, Reply)

( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 20:51, Reply)

but they are pretty awful to have to listen to.
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:00, Reply)

how was the album launch.
have you ever noticed the word album has the word bum in it?
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:05, Reply)

Bit disappointed that AB didn't pop in as he was in town, but other than that a thoroughly enjoyable evening.
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 22:05, Reply)

( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:44, Reply)

But you had to be contemporary to see the context.
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:50, Reply)

While on balance I prefer the Stones, I must admit the Beatles had more range. I think they are over-played and over-rated, but they had a big effect on popular music. it's hard to view them objectively, but I think it's fair to say they weren't shit, except from a subjective point of view in which case all bets are off.
Unless Dozer Likes them, then they'd donkey balls.
( , Tue 23 Jul 2013, 21:58, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »