Not at all, no
These scruffy cunts who break into houses and try to legally claim residence. GET TO FUCK. It isn't your building so fuck off
( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:17, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

Community ownership, reclaim the streets, hippy bullshit cunts.
CASE CLOSED
( MEATSNAKE Richard Hammond, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:19, Reply)

Anyone squatting in my gaff will be forcibly ejected

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:21, Reply)

strikethrough a
replace with u

understandable
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:25, Reply)

squutting?

( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:26, Reply)

guff?

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:27, Reply)

No thanks, I've just put one out.

( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:27, Reply)

I did offer

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:30, Reply)

GUFFTASTIC

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:27, Reply)

Isn't that illegal?
Rory? Or if he's not here, perhaps swipe could ask one of the men in her office?
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:34, Reply)

I couldnt give a fuck
They would be out
( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:38, Reply)

LEAVE YOUR YURTPOLITICS OUT OF THIS

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:42, Reply)

ok Peter Rachman calm down
I think there is a clear difference between using an empty property and breaking in to houses, although the law was changed last year to stop residential properties being squatted, you would still have to be resident for 12 years prior to even making a claim for ownership. If a building hasn't been used or claimed for that long then it should be usefully employed.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:22, Reply)

what??
how can you tell someone what they ought to do with their own property? isn't that a bit.... dictatorial?
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:23, Reply)

Yep
But aren't all laws? Most laws are in place to benefit the common good i.e. you cant kill someone you don't like. So (and I know getting to this argument with a property lawyer is fucking stupid as I only have a very limited knowledge of the subject) surely it makes sense for someone without a home to utilise an empty property. I agree that damage etc. is not acceptable however there are ways of getting the utilities connected legitimately and so on.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:30, Reply)

"surely it makes sense for someone without a home to utilise an empty property"
only if they want to utilise it! you can't say, "you must do this with your land, because this person has chosen to drop out of society and has nowhere else to go".
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:31, Reply)

Nonsense.
I'll decide when I want to use my stuff, thanks, not you.
( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:25, Reply)

especially if you've paid for it
and you pay rates on it, and you pay to insure it, and you pay to maintain it. why should you do all that, just so that someone else can sit in it for free?
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Nov 2013, 15:26, Reply)