b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2195670 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

no no Stunned, you're right, any charity runs far more effectively on a shoestring budget with simpleton staff, how silly of me to suggest otherwise.

(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:35, 2 replies, latest was 11 years ago)
Yes, of course.
Fucking simpleton.
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:36, Reply)
sorry, so do you think that large charities should pay executive level salaries at less than market rates?
Because if staff at that level or with particular skills/experience are required, how else should they be attracted to and retained by the organisation?
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:42, Reply)
The fact that it's a charity.
That should be their motivation.

Like when slebs do charity things for free. I'm not suggesting they shouldn't be paid, but they should be doing it for less than the market rate because they want to help the charity.

Of course this will never happen, as people are scum.
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:08, Reply)
well of course
I can't see an additional rate taxpayer opting to take a 30k drop in salary just because it's a charity.
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:09, Reply)
No, you can't. Neither can I.
Still - one can dream.

Who mentioned 30k?
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:11, Reply)
Dozer did, in the post above yours

(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:13, Reply)
I plucked the figure from the ether.
So what reduction in salary do you think there should be in the charity sector then?
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:21, Reply)
I dint actually mention a reduction in salary.
But rather that I was aware that larger charities operate far more like profit-making companies than what might be perceived as making money for charity.

CEO bonuses and expensive "research trips" abroad withstanding.
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 13:29, Reply)
People's wages aren't directly proportional to either their intelligence or their ability.

(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:37, Reply)
yes, I know this.
Thanks for the info!
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:38, Reply)
So your inference that low wages equals simpleton staff, or that high wages equals skilled staff is a bit silly.

(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:41, Reply)
no, you are simplifying my point
Large charities are often comparable in size to large companies, in terms of turnover, money raised etc, so senior staff with the appropriate experience of such organisations need to be offered comparable benefits. Why would you expect to pay less than the going rate?
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:45, Reply)
... because you're a chariddy.

(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:51, Reply)
oh dear

(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:52, Reply)
I agree.
It's a great shame, but we're selfish creatures.
(, Fri 24 Jan 2014, 12:58, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1