b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2352280 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

It might annoy the likes of swipe, who would prefer to see more money in the hands of the highest earners.

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:22, 3 replies, latest was 10 years ago)
Oh sorry, you said down sides!

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:22, Reply)
Well I laughed at least.

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:48, Reply)
But they've already got more money, due to the fact that they're the highest earners.

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:23, Reply)
But they need more, see?
They could save it or put it to good use.
And then it might 'trickle down' to the less fortunate in society somehow.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:24, Reply)

earners achievers
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:26, Reply)
Surely having a high income is a high achievement?

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:32, Reply)
no
it's the reward for working hard. the job and what you give back are the achievements.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:37, Reply)
Not always.

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:38, Reply)
presumably
you will be giving your house and any money to society rather than to your kids?

we all know your "achievement" already. you're leaving behind giant round black coasters to protect future generations of coffee tables.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:42, Reply)
Indirectly through taxation, yes.
I'm pretty proud of my "achievement" and am glad there will be something left after I am dead.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:47, Reply)
no, that's avoiding the question
are you leaving your house and any saved money to your kids? you seem to be against other people saving and passing it down, so presumably you'd never do it yourself.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:51, Reply)
I'm not sure where you got that idea from

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:53, Reply)
It's the people who would save it that are part of the problem.

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:58, Reply)
Oh right, you misunderstood me.
As Bonzo or someone pointed out in the same subthread, spending the £71 would provide more of a stimulation for the economy than squirrelling it away.
I am not against saving, in fact I think it is a sensible thing to do.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:02, Reply)
stop being sensible
you want everyone to give their houses up in some kind of giant yurt fest, admit it.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:18, Reply)
+ in the nude

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:21, Reply)
Like bankers and politicians you mean?

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:40, Reply)
yes
they work so hard and nobody loves them for it, it's a crying shame...
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:42, Reply)
I feel more sorry for those who work so hard and don't get the same remuneration.
However thick and annoying they are.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:54, Reply)
i don't
some people should get a lot more than they do. nurses and teachers definitely should. but the general public? thick and annoying. and you should know. you live in cov where they invented it.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:02, Reply)
What about the support staff that enable nurses and teachers to do their jobs?
A lot of them are quite thick and annoying.
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:06, Reply)
Hey how about everyone getting a lump sum from the government every week to top up their wages
It wouldn't have to be much just say £71 or something
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:11, Reply)
Commie prick.

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:15, Reply)
The Peoples Flag is Deepest Red

(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:19, Reply)
not as thick and annoying as the kids and the patients
if we're being totally fair
(, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:18, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1