
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

Well, after thirty-three years, Reader's Digest have finally caught up with me.
Today I recieved my first ever fake cheque for £250,000.
Hell knows how they found me - only Inland Revenue and DWP know I live here, so someone's on the make.
But that's besides the point. What I want to know is, is it worth me responding for the chance to win money? Or is it just an excuse to send me even more junk mail?
Run my life for me, Off Topic!
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 15:38, 10 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

But if you've got a spare hour, have a look at this and see if you fancy fighting the banks...
www.goodthink.com/writing/view_stories.cfm?id=11&page_id=2
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 15:47, Reply)

otherwise you'll spend the best part of 18 months accepting a free book, sending unwanted books back, returning further 'next stage' prize draw slips, receiving further special offers, forgetting to cancel subscriptions you inadvertantly signed up to, and all for fuck all...
/May have been through it himself after thinking 'why not? How hard can it be?
More trouble than it's bloody worth if you ask me.
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 17:27, Reply)

I've just spent the last 30 minutes going through your links on matched betting. Seems so easy, yet there are warnings all over the forums you link to that it isn't easy.. What do I need to watch out for here? I did A-level Further Maths a few years ago and this matched betting just seems like really simple statistics, easily computable with a simple spreadsheet. The headache is setting up all the internet accounts and managing them, no? But really, £50 a week looks very, very possible for just messing around on the computer..
*waits for someone to tell him how ridiculous such an idea is really*
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 17:28, Reply)

That's what I thought. It's so cunningly packaged that the average mug could easily fall for it.
But I'm an above-average mug... so in the recycling it goes :)
@ bored and horny - gaz fireflier - his numbers speak for themselves.
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 17:43, Reply)

They obviously got wise to that one:
"This 'cheque' is for illustration purposes only and cannot be used for transaction between any bank, building society or any other account."
Made me
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 20:32, Reply)

if i get this sort of thing, i bundle it all back into the prepaid envelope with 'no thanks' scrawled all over it in marker pen' and post it back to them, making sure i include the bit with my name and address on it, and the envelope it all originally came in.
and i register with the mail preference service
( , Mon 5 Jan 2009, 21:25, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »