Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
For example, I really like purple as a colour. Whilst I appreciate the hues and tones of other colours, purple just stands out as the most awesome of colours for me*. Somebody should write an article about it, after all, it's been around a hell of a lot longer than that Bowie song.
*Except maybe black; but technically, black isn't a colour in its own right, it's an absence of colour. I read it in a book once.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:28, 41 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
it's the colour that absorbs all incoming light as opposed to white things, which reflect all incoming light.
And anyway, you're so totally wrong, purple is massively overrated it's just cunts that read the observer colour magazine that like purple.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:30, Reply)
Once again, being forced to do some work mid-reply makes me look like a mong.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:49, Reply)
IT'S NOT ALL LIGHT ITS VISIBLE LIGHT AND THE PERCEPTION OF COLOUR IS NOT JUST BASED ON THE SENSATION OF DIFFERENT WAVELENGTHS AND INTENSITY OF LIGHT IT HAS A PSYCHOLOGICAL COMPONENT AS CAN BE PROVEN WHEN LOOKING AT COAL IN BRIGHT SUNLIGHT AND CHALK IN LOW LIGHT, THE COAL WILL REFLECT MORE LIGHT THAN THE CHALK BUT YOU STILL SEE IT AS BLACKER BECAUSE ITS A MIXTURE OF A LEARNED RESPONSE AND CONTRAST.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:48, Reply)
the mechanisms for lightness and colour constancy aren't fully understood so they aren't necessarily a learned response.
Retinal ganglion cells, y'all.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 15:07, Reply)
I am dubious about this. It sounds a lot like one of those "how do you scientists explain THAT then, eh?" arguments that are clearly wrong but that require a lot of tedious physics to refute properly. I'm sure that black shiny things are still black and matt white things are still white, and your ability to use them as a mirror (or not) is unrelated to their actual colour.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 15:20, Reply)
in that our visual system is able to somehow discount changes in light levels so that we perceive lightness and colour as remaining pretty stable and constant despite regular fluctuations in illumination (e.g. the sun coming out from behind a cloud).
This is a good thing - it allows us to see objects as objects rather than continually reassess them if we have to judge changes in their appearance. It's not straightforward adaptation - there's more to it than that - but the jury's still out on how it all works.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 15:26, Reply)
that the absorption spectra will remain constant regardless of the level of light, and this is what gives us our perception of colour. And also, I still think colour and reflectivity are different - shape plays an important role, in that things that aren't perfectly flat won't seem as reflective even though the substance they are made of is exactly the same.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 15:41, Reply)
a shiny sphere that's as shiny as a shiny flat thing will look just as shiny.
Tell you what, let's set up an experiment. One that involves the risk of potential blindness, though we'll hide that from the ethics commitee. We can probably get away with a relatively small sample size since its a low level visual study but we can use a non-parametric test in addition to means analysis. I recommend a two-alternative forced choice procedure in conjunction with a staircase method to give us a threshold estimate of shininess. I also recommend poking particpants in the eye with a stick if they don't give me the results I want.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 15:51, Reply)
One eye at a time, or should we make the study double-blind?
*ashames*
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 16:01, Reply)
If I hadn't said it Vipros would have, and then he'd have been all smug about it.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 16:32, Reply)
I'm not a scientist, I'm an engineer. I don't know about experiments.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 16:47, Reply)
and has never released unrelentingly twee bilge masquerading as music.
Or been shot to DEATH by a fan.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:33, Reply)
I got better.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:38, Reply)
You ham-touching philistine! Everyone knows that GREEN is the superior secondary colour. It's influences (Blue and Yellow) were so much better. Stupid Purple, trying to mix Red with the great inspirations of Blue. What a cock of a colour.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:50, Reply)
so I'm TOTALLY WITH YOUR THERE.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:53, Reply)
as my awesome coat will testify.
But purple is synonymous with Cadbury's chocolate and the Hulk's trousers and is therefore officially brilliant.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:57, Reply)
The Hulk?
The Incredible Hulk, who was GREEN? Less of this Purple bollocks!
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:58, Reply)
How can you focus on his shorts, when it's the monster himself that's made of win! You're a fool man! A FOOL!
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:58, Reply)
Yeah? You know what I'm getting at.
They're purple and he likes purple.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:59, Reply)
And throbbing. Throbbing and purple is what he likes.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 15:04, Reply)
*loves Vimto best of all the purple soft drinks*
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 14:53, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »