Please justify your ignorance,
I'll reply after a fag.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:22, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

Ok it was a broad statement
But basically if a man rapes a woman I think we should be allowed to cuts bits off. And if someone repeatedly commits offenses then I don't see why they should get all the benefits of three meals a day, warm bed, tv etc when a lot of law abiding people don't.

Basically I get really fucking pissed off when a minority of lazy fucktards like screwing over people who work hard for their stuff.

I am quite angry aboutit today as I had a dream someone broke into my car and stole my 100 Hits of the 80s cd. I worked hard to buy that CD goddamn you thieving cuntbags, the penalty for dening me the chance to listen to Aztec Camera, Duran Duran and the superb Wham Rap loudly on my way to work should be punishable by death DEATH.
( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:29, Reply)

I've decided I'm going to change my point of view with every reply to this, to see what happens.
Wouldn't it be better to guarntie that everyone gets 3 meals a day and shelter, rather than dennying someone that? You can't say "Someone who's innocent doesn't have, so why should someone guilty have?", it's not one person taking food from another's mouth, if that was the case then I might agree, it's a matter of not having a proper system in place, dispite having one of the best systems in the world.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:35, Reply)

Hang the bounders, I say.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:36, Reply)

I think public hangings
would generate much needed revenue at this time of economic downturn
( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:41, Reply)

I could get to Newgate/Tyburn on the bus in about 10 mins from my house
I'd buy a fucking season ticket.
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:04, Reply)

You're a criminal, as widely advertised here

(Fancy a weekend on my Raymondo Luxury Yacht?, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:30, Reply)

You're a wanker, as widely advertised here

( Noeli overtheshoulderboulderholderthingstraplatchboobs, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:38, Reply)

I reckon I should be on your list, noely you little cunt
no-one on the board has given me consistent abuse like you have over the years. one of the reasons I mostly keep away.
(Fancy a weekend on my Raymondo Luxury Yacht?, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 14:10, Reply)

I didn't even know it was you.
The username inspired me. I'm surprised you came back after your little flounce.
( Noeli overtheshoulderboulderholderthingstraplatchboobs, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 14:33, Reply)

who then cuts his bits off,
who administers this "justice" if someone makes a career out of punishing the criminals, what makes them any better than the criminals? Is it because the state tells them to they're allowed?

The benifits of 3 meals a day, a warm bed and TV are not the same as freedom.
TV is used in prisons to keep them in line, it's not a reward for their crimes it's a way to stop them from rioting all the time.
Meals and a warm bed are part of our responsibility to keep them healthy. Or should they all die of malnutrition?

I don't think a dream you had is really a useful example.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:41, Reply)

Rioting from no TV?
Cattle prods would soon sort that out. And why should they be kept healthy if they can't abide by simple laws of don't fucking steal stuff you townie twatbag.

Also that was a most excellent example
( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:43, Reply)

Depends on the level of crime, really.
Someone who's gone on the nick for a few years, and needs to be locked up for a few years, shouldn't have their health suffer.

In the same respect, P.O.Ws that shoot at your collegues and comrads, who I'd be more inclined to hurt due to them attacking you personally, even deserve human rights.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:48, Reply)

They really wouldn't,
your idea that you just have to keep upping the violence to stop the violence is absolutly retarded. It's been proven again and again that it doesn't work. It just fulfils the bloodlust of the stupid, while not helping the problem in any way.

If your ideas were implemented there would be more violent crime, prison services would cost more and you'd put the country back to pre WWII levels of cruelty and ignorance.

You're an idiot.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:51, Reply)

I think for the reason of science
we should implement my ideas and see what happens.
( TGB checking Off Topic is still shit at, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:54, Reply)

Like in china,
or saudia arabia, or in everyfucking country that tried it before we knew better?

Don't think your stupidity is a new thing, you're practically medieval in your convictions.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:57, Reply)

In regards to your first point....
Is a soldure at the end of a gun responsible for carrying out his orders? Does the weight of the entire army, whatever army that be, lay in the hands of an individual? The Corperal who tells the private, the general who tells the corperal, the politition that tells the general or the public that votes in the politition ?
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:46, Reply)

I was just following orders
isn't a legal justification for war crimes.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:54, Reply)

No, but it can be used to justify the killing of accidental-innocents.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:05, Reply)

Accidentally killing civillians isn't a war crime
deliberatly targeting them is.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:08, Reply)

You'd still feel gutted if you found out that happened to you though.
gutted is probably an understatement.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:14, Reply)

What I mean is, you found out, after the act, that they were innocent and people above you knew that.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:14, Reply)

0o0o0o0o, ok then.
What about someone who horrifly and voilently rapes children, leaving them scared for life, living a life akin to being worst than death... should they really be allowed Wiis in their private cell that they have a key too?
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:30, Reply)

a wii is not
a human right
( Citizen Cavy Admires your passion for conformity, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:34, Reply)

Well done, you're right, it isn't.
The point was that criminals have it to easy, you get things like this, and to be frank, it irritates me. These people have commited some of the worst crimes known the the UK. They're so bad, they can't even be released into the greater prison population, for fear or repisal. Yet they're getting Wiis in their rooms. It's discusting, and wrong, I'd rather see that get donated to a children's ward at a hospital.

This time I'm for the removal of human rights on prisoners
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:38, Reply)

Wii's aren't a human right though as you said.
That's a different point.
(PsychoChomp, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:42, Reply)

Hard labour should be used
Why the fuck these miscreants aren't made to offset the enormous costs of their incarceration themselves is a complete mystery to me. They could give something back whilst potentially learning useful skills, and having to do gruelling work all day really would be a deterrent as opposed to bumming each other all day and trading phone cards or whatever it is these people do.

Failing that, hang the bounders.
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:20, Reply)

Broadmoor's not a prison though,
it's a psychiatric hospital. Which is quite a lot different.
(wellgroomedwookiee is a filthy-minded hobgoblin, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 13:23, Reply)

Exactly - they're all MENKLE
You could probably give them an empty Weetabix box and tell them it was a Wii, they'd never even notice.
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 14:12, Reply)