Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
You see? My salary is quite a bit under the £44,000 or wathever the limit is; but I think I earn enough to maintain a child if I had to. I'd have to stop buying some expensive things and traveling so much, but ey, everybody has to do sacrifices if they want something, so I wouldn't ask for child benefit.
About the house benefit, I don't understand it. Does it mean that the goverment gives people around £21,000 per year to spend in rent and that?
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:25, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
The Housing Benefit system just about works, but it does get abused like any system giving out free money. The decision to cap it at £400 per week is spot-on I reckon, and I'd be interested to hear an argument against it.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:29, Reply)
I'm going to go on the dole if I can get me a £400 a week house.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:32, Reply)
a sawn-off and two illegal pitbulls, last time I checked.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:36, Reply)
That's what my mate pays
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:38, Reply)
my pokey 1928 red brick ex-council ground floor 1-bed unfurnished, I could get £1000 pcm for it.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:40, Reply)
This sounds worringly like a Daily Heil comment. Sorry for that.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:49, Reply)
I'm a MASSIVE RACIST, so I won't judge you. For the difference in price, I'd go for the 3bed+garden...
So, why do all these people have to live in London? And don't say it's because of work, because they don't work; and a lot of other people has to commute.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:54, Reply)
Telling people where to live and forcing them out en mass smells of pogroms to me though. In the 60's Londoners were given financial incentives to move to what were called "overspill towns" such as Basingstoke, Newbury & Reading. It may be more of an option to look at that again.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:57, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:03, Reply)
It's telling them "we're giving you this money, which is quite reasonable, now, where would you like to live?"
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:09, Reply)
but christ, anyone who's living in a £1,600+ a month house should be able to sort a job out.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:35, Reply)
Why am I going to have to commute for more than 1h to get to work every morning, while people on benefits can "afford" living right in the centre?
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:44, Reply)
One in particular is having benefit paid to live in Notting Hill. They should move him somewhere cheaper - nothing drastic but at least to zone 2 or 3.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:33, Reply)
Benefit should be to support the worse-off, not maintain people's opulent lifestyles.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:43, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:47, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:58, Reply)
Inc Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:49, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:54, Reply)
no-one has a 'right' to live in any borough apart from the right to do so BECAUSE YOU CAN AFFORD IT.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:01, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:51, Reply)
I think that's abusive. You pay around £800/month for a 3 bedroom detached house in Manchester; assume it's around £1200 in London; that's still a lot less than what they get!
I understand the Con-Lib saying that it's unfair that the working people can't afford a house in London, but the people on the dole can. I'm working, and I wouldn't dare spending that much money on my house! FFS!!
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:42, Reply)
*fashions weaponry from discarded copies of the Daily Mail*
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:13, Reply)
that's almost twice as much what I'm paying at the moment!
However, everybody gets very upset with the benefits thing and all that, but I think where the country is really losing money is with tax dodgers, like Vodafone.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:18, Reply)
My MD is guilty of using tax havens. He wasn't happy when I suggested the UK should invade Jersey, therefore abolishing it as a tax haven.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:29, Reply)
and stopping the tax haven in Gibraltar. It's not exactly a tax haven, though, it's more like No-one's land, with no law and no order.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:37, Reply)
who have 6+ kids, do no work and are being housed in million pound houses/flats. Admittedly there aren't that many of them, but it really is a fucking disgrace. Unfortunately these parasites tend to be from the immigrant communities and this horrendous exploitation of the generosity of our benefits culture invariably ends up splashed all over the Daily Mail and is thus grist to the BNP's mill.
The lily-livered, chickneshit BNP. They don't go nearly far enough, right Aber?
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:34, Reply)
All inmigrants should be sent back to their countries or killed. No, wait a moment... that's not good for me either...
I don't think it's all inmigrants fault. All the massive families that I see on the street, with young parents and 4-6 kids running and screaming around, are white, British families.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:47, Reply)
are holed up in their massive free houses eating smelly food and making bombs. You don't get to see them.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:52, Reply)
the system shouldn't be able to be so easily abused though, that's what needs fixing.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:52, Reply)
It doesn't matter who's doing it. The system shouldn't allow it to happen. I don't have any kids right now, not because I don't want, but because I couldn't afford them. If you can't afford them, don't have them. I can understand a couple having one or 2 mistakes, but 4? or 8?
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:57, Reply)
you should have to take a competent parental test before you're allowed to have kids.
This will take place in my Orwellian future, it'll be double plus good.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:02, Reply)
coupled with my 'compulsory sterilisation of inferior racial groups and spackers' could turn this world around within two generations.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:07, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:09, Reply)
Please say yes, we can't afford to go private.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:09, Reply)
Midgets are 'front of the queue'.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:14, Reply)
she has an excellent contingency plan for if a virus takes over. It involves not giving the vaccine to people with a low IQ.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:13, Reply)
There are too many people in the world, Hitler had the right idea BUT was stupid in picking one group. Fuck creed, colour, nationality and faith, just kill the stupid people.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:16, Reply)
maybe set it up like Running Man where you get hunted. The stupid, fat and crippled would be the first to go.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:36, Reply)
I used to think like you. Then I met one of the most wonderful girls in the world: sweet, helpful, clever, hard working, pretty... she's a fantastic friend and very good company. Her mother and father, on the other hand, are the type of people I would have forbbiden to have any kids. Alcoholics, waste of money, scum.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:11, Reply)
Your parents are not scum, dear; and I haven't even met them yet :)
However, I understand the misunderstanding, as you're lovely and all those other things I said.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:21, Reply)
to change the system so that housing benefits were paid to the tenant instead of directly to the landlord. here, you've got no money. have a massive cheque, we trust you to cash it and pay it to your landlord, not spunk it on plasma screen televisions and designer clothes that you deserve when you don't work for them.
also to change the law again, as a consequence of low council-housing stock, so that there is a statutory formula that landlords can use to squeeze much more cash out of councils who are paying to house these families than they would get if they let their houses on the private market. eg foxtons valued my flat at £850 a week. allow for foxtons' wild exaggeration, and it's probably worth £750 a week on the private market. i then go to the statutory calculator and realise i can get £1,000 a week if the council put tenants in there at the tax-payers' expense.
ridiculous!
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:24, Reply)
But, but, but...!!!
Oh, the day had started so well and I'm so upset now!
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:29, Reply)
that's why you now see stories about non-working families with hundreds of children living in 8 bedroom mansions at £3,000 per week. well done gordon/tony, that was a truly special piece of legislation.
the problem is, that sort of benefit relies on people being honest and hardworking, and only claiming when they need to/are genuinely disabled. but far too many people aren't like that and will rape and milk a system that should only be there for those in genuine need.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:39, Reply)
as they were often in a position where they weren't earning money and may well have been in a relationship where all finance was controlled by their partner. Child Benefit was a way of addressing that - as a universal benefit it could well be of use across the board for people in need of cash (possibly to escape a relationship in which they were financially dependent).
Agreed, I won't need Child Benefit once I'm back at work, but right now it comes in very useful.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:53, Reply)
I understand some help to mothers or fathers, while their babies are too young, but then, the parents should go back to work. Right, there is a whole world out there with different cases, and single parents, and that; but child benefit shouldn't be used as a salary, as a reason to stop working. Having kids and bringing them up, is not a job that the goverment should be paying.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 8:59, Reply)
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:02, Reply)
So, how come there is people saying they get around £42,000/year for having 5 kids, and that they prefer to have more kids rather than going back to work? Do they get more money for something else?
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:02, Reply)
and things like income support. They would have to go for every benefit they possibly could to get that amount.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:04, Reply)
I used to give her the money, and she went down the pub with it. She was 15 at the time.
(, Tue 2 Nov 2010, 9:02, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread