Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
and thus belongs in a musuem or suchlike, not some Russian oligarch's house
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:41, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
painting, drawing, sculpture
NOT a fucking chainsaw and a fish
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:43, Reply)
Fucking incredible, the detail is just phenomenal.
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:43, Reply)
If I could make it (given the right materials obviously) then it's not fucking art.
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:45, Reply)
With the right training most people (who aren't spackhanded retards) could copy almost any piece of art. So, therefore, you could make most of these things. What you couldn't do is make it originally, because you didn't have the idea. Ideas are just as much skill as being able to weild a brush or a chisel or a violin bow.
But, I still think Hirst's stuff is shite, mind.
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:49, Reply)
Most of the time they're porn related.
"I go around fucking these chicks, and we pay them, and we do it on video, and then sale the videos".
Or
"Facebook, yeah', £25b, yeah', how about we make a website that's like facebook, only it's for pugs. We'll make a fortune, there must be loads of pugs owners out there who want to share their pugs."
or
"Yeah', just like google, only it would belong to us".
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 12:36, Reply)
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 12:37, Reply)
and what about sculpture, they use hammers and wooden sculptures use chainsaws.
I think you're underestimating how hard it is to cut a shark in half and preserve it.
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:45, Reply)
Do you think he actually did it?
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:46, Reply)
I mean, I pretty much agree, but others certainly would argue that as long as it is willingly displayed and appreciated it can be classed as art.
(, Tue 7 Dec 2010, 11:43, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread