Professions I Hate
Broken Arrow says: Bankers, recruitment consultants, politicians. What professions do you hate and why?
( , Thu 27 May 2010, 12:26)
Broken Arrow says: Bankers, recruitment consultants, politicians. What professions do you hate and why?
( , Thu 27 May 2010, 12:26)
« Go Back
Airline staff who get commission for charging you extra on the bag
They're scum, although not as much as the grinning bastard behind it all.
And yes, I'm talking about Crynair.com
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 12:55, 27 replies)
They're scum, although not as much as the grinning bastard behind it all.
And yes, I'm talking about Crynair.com
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 12:55, 27 replies)
just the act of paying
when it's over weight pisses me off. I'm 12st wet through and I get the same allowance as some person way heavier than me? I think they should bring in a £ per Lb per mile. That'd make it a lot fairer.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:02, closed)
when it's over weight pisses me off. I'm 12st wet through and I get the same allowance as some person way heavier than me? I think they should bring in a £ per Lb per mile. That'd make it a lot fairer.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:02, closed)
The woman that told me my bag was overweight was morbidly obese herself. (Probably why she was just ground staff).
I wanted to suggest the bag is overweight as her stomach was overhanging onto the scales.
But I didn't.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:05, closed)
That is a FANTASTIC idea
You + your bag must weigh less than, say 15st or you pay extra.
Can we also have air miles working in reverse? Pretty please? So someone going on holiday once in a blue moon pays a lot less than someone fucking up the planet in a plane every single day for little reason?
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:05, closed)
You + your bag must weigh less than, say 15st or you pay extra.
Can we also have air miles working in reverse? Pretty please? So someone going on holiday once in a blue moon pays a lot less than someone fucking up the planet in a plane every single day for little reason?
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:05, closed)
Yes - that is a very good idea
Though I don't think the airline industry would like it.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:17, closed)
Though I don't think the airline industry would like it.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:17, closed)
why on Earth would someone fly on a plane every day for little reason
it's not a very comfortable way to travel
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:42, closed)
it's not a very comfortable way to travel
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:42, closed)
I think this. I think everyone should pay by collective weight of them and their baggage.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:16, closed)
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:16, closed)
There's even sort of a precedent for it,
on those rare occasions when the plane can't take off and they have to ask four or five fat bastards to take the next flight instead.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:22, closed)
on those rare occasions when the plane can't take off and they have to ask four or five fat bastards to take the next flight instead.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:22, closed)
this is bollocks
unless you're talking about a small prop plane (which would probably only have about 4 or 5 spaces anyway) - if anybody asked 4 or 5 fat people to leave a plane I was on because otherwise it won't take off, then I'd be right after them.
The most they'll ever do is ask heavier people to sit nearer the wing or, if there is a problem with one of the holds, ask them to sit on the opposite side of the plane
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:35, closed)
unless you're talking about a small prop plane (which would probably only have about 4 or 5 spaces anyway) - if anybody asked 4 or 5 fat people to leave a plane I was on because otherwise it won't take off, then I'd be right after them.
The most they'll ever do is ask heavier people to sit nearer the wing or, if there is a problem with one of the holds, ask them to sit on the opposite side of the plane
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:35, closed)
Speaking from a position of utter ignorance
I would assume that various models of plane have a maximum weight they are permitted to carry - probably set somewhat below the point that safety would become an issue. If the combined weight of people+baggage exceeded this, wouldn't it be fairly likely that a few passengers+associated baggage would have to get off, just to get back below the numbers insisted upon by insurers (or whatever)?
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 14:59, closed)
I would assume that various models of plane have a maximum weight they are permitted to carry - probably set somewhat below the point that safety would become an issue. If the combined weight of people+baggage exceeded this, wouldn't it be fairly likely that a few passengers+associated baggage would have to get off, just to get back below the numbers insisted upon by insurers (or whatever)?
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 14:59, closed)
but if the aircraft was skirting that close to the maximum weight that 4 people would make a difference
then I'd rather not fly with them
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 16:33, closed)
then I'd rather not fly with them
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 16:33, closed)
yeah, he stole that off me.
I came up with that one when I went skiing with my dad when I was 15, 20ish years ago, but thanks for the credit.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 17:43, closed)
I came up with that one when I went skiing with my dad when I was 15, 20ish years ago, but thanks for the credit.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 17:43, closed)
This is why
I wear as many clothes as possible on the way through. Then just shove it in overhead compartments!
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:21, closed)
I wear as many clothes as possible on the way through. Then just shove it in overhead compartments!
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 13:21, closed)
this
i've only ever needed my full allowance twice - once when i moved from Glasgow to Barcelona, and then when I returned to Barcelona after two months in Berlin
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 15:50, closed)
i've only ever needed my full allowance twice - once when i moved from Glasgow to Barcelona, and then when I returned to Barcelona after two months in Berlin
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 15:50, closed)
and me
but unfortunately women don't seem to be able to follow that directive.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 17:44, closed)
but unfortunately women don't seem to be able to follow that directive.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 17:44, closed)
or me
because I like snowboarding but can't afford fantastic new blingy lightweight kit, my stuff is all old and heavy.
But I try to avoid Ryanair like syphilis so it's less of a problem.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 20:13, closed)
because I like snowboarding but can't afford fantastic new blingy lightweight kit, my stuff is all old and heavy.
But I try to avoid Ryanair like syphilis so it's less of a problem.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 20:13, closed)
I find this all hilarious
I'm more concerned with the fact that Ryanair had 9 complaints held against them from trading standard in the first half of 2007*, rather than the slightly extra they charge for the little things.
Ask your family what it was like trying to fly anywhere 20 years ago. Now it's as cheap as fuck and you're whinging that you have to pay a little bit more to take on a hold bag.
It's cheaper and quicker than the train
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 16:36, closed)
I'm more concerned with the fact that Ryanair had 9 complaints held against them from trading standard in the first half of 2007*, rather than the slightly extra they charge for the little things.
Ask your family what it was like trying to fly anywhere 20 years ago. Now it's as cheap as fuck and you're whinging that you have to pay a little bit more to take on a hold bag.
It's cheaper and quicker than the train
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 16:36, closed)
People don't mind paying extra for a ticket if it's all included.
It's the shitty little extra charges (credit card surcharge and online check-in - even though there's no other way) that piss everyone off so much.
Charge more and don't hide behind extra charges that 99% can't avoid.
Fuckers.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 19:12, closed)
I fly business from time to time
When you total up all the extras and hidden charges, its usually the same cost for flying with a proper scheduled carrier who actually treat you like a human being. Sod wanker-air and fly BA, Air France KLM etc
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 19:56, closed)
When you total up all the extras and hidden charges, its usually the same cost for flying with a proper scheduled carrier who actually treat you like a human being. Sod wanker-air and fly BA, Air France KLM etc
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 19:56, closed)
^ this ^
definitely. Go to the BA website and look up a European flight. Cost quoted is all-in and usually to an airport near a town. Go to the Ryanair website and work out the actual cost of paying for that flight and your usual luggage and checking in online and then transferring yourself the 200 miles to the town named on the website that you actually wanted to visit. Almost anything is cheaper and less scummy than Ryanair. I cannot quantify how much I despise that thieving shyster company.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 20:16, closed)
definitely. Go to the BA website and look up a European flight. Cost quoted is all-in and usually to an airport near a town. Go to the Ryanair website and work out the actual cost of paying for that flight and your usual luggage and checking in online and then transferring yourself the 200 miles to the town named on the website that you actually wanted to visit. Almost anything is cheaper and less scummy than Ryanair. I cannot quantify how much I despise that thieving shyster company.
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 20:16, closed)
Actually...
for distances under 300-500km (ie most intra-continental flights), trains are quicker/cheaper/more hygienic*
*assuming you have a decent rail system.
( , Sun 30 May 2010, 9:41, closed)
for distances under 300-500km (ie most intra-continental flights), trains are quicker/cheaper/more hygienic*
*assuming you have a decent rail system.
( , Sun 30 May 2010, 9:41, closed)
I blame Bryanair customers.
An airline cannot afford to operate safely and within the rules when selling fares at 2 a time. So, don't pay them.
I fly quite regularly and if I was charged less than about 100 a flight I d wonder how good their insurance and engineering crews were
If a flight to the Bahamas costs less than the taxi to the airport then, perhaps, it's dodgy..
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 19:00, closed)
An airline cannot afford to operate safely and within the rules when selling fares at 2 a time. So, don't pay them.
I fly quite regularly and if I was charged less than about 100 a flight I d wonder how good their insurance and engineering crews were
If a flight to the Bahamas costs less than the taxi to the airport then, perhaps, it's dodgy..
( , Fri 28 May 2010, 19:00, closed)
« Go Back