b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Sacked II » Post 2292937 | Search
This is a question Sacked II

I once had a "friend" (I hated his guts) who lost two jobs on the same day - he drunkenly crashed the taxi he was driving when he was supposed to be at his office job. How have you been sacked?

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 13:33)
Pages: Popular, 4, 3, 2, 1

« Go Back

While I was a student
I used to work in an off licence directly underneath the flat I used to live in - I rented a room in a house with a family of five.

Yes, we could drink as much stock as we wanted - but we had to pay for it (full price, too, no staff discount or anything).
I had just closed up one night, on the phone to a girl I liked at the time, when a mate pulled up in his ancient Fiat - so I finish the call and let him in.
"I've got a bottle of vodka!" he explained - "AND some greenery!"
Well, we couldn't really smoke in the house - as it wasn't MY house to smoke in - but I did have the keys to the off licence - and we did used to smoke in the stock room.

So, we drank the vodka, smoked some weed, then got cracking into the beers in the stock room. A literally limitless supply! We were having quite a good laugh, carried on being daft 'till about 3:00 in the morning - then went upstairs to crash out. We were just entering the house when the youngest son - probably 15 or so - enquired "did you see the cops 'round here earlier?"
I said we hadn't.
"Yeah, about two o'clock - two of them sniffing about right outside the offy back doors" he explained.

Christ. Well, they didn't knock on the offy's back door, and there was no sign of them now = no problem.

Went to bed, woke up, my mate left. Eventually went to work again later in the day - when my boss pulls me aside and asks me: "Why was the silent alarm pressed at 1:45 in the morning?"

Turns out - while I was having a much needed piss, my mate was wondering what the unusual switch was on the wall of the stock room, and pressed it. Pressed it several times, in fact, as nothing appeared to be happening. Hence the police turning up and mooching about - luckily we had tidied up all of the massive drugs though, I never got it in the neck for that. Was kicked out of work there and then.

The next week I started a job in the town hall - which eventually paid about £250 a week. This was tax free as I was a student - five times as much as what I was earning in the offy! Socially ruined my weekends, but the drinks were free (absolutely NO stock control), and it gave me experience of working behind a bar, managing staff, and working as a supervisor in a food court in a leisure centre. Great job, terrific pay.

Then I got sacked from that for lending the keys to the squash courts out.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 19:17, 31 replies)
Stop getting sacked, ffs.

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 20:23, closed)
since when did students pay no tax?

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 21:33, closed)
since Cash In Hand?
since Tips?
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 21:39, closed)
what's that got to do with being a student?

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 21:45, closed)
I concur, a council owned premises would deduct tax and PAYE and the person if due a refund from
HMRC would receive the refund from HMRC and not from the employer.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 21:56, closed)
I think this anecdote happened IN THE PAST.
before all this modern toss and HMRC.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:13, closed)
what are you prattling on about, you dopey twat?

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:17, closed)
tell you what, I'll stop trying to read his mind.
ask the OP.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:29, closed)
I did, you soppy prick.
Nobody asked you to chuck in your witless suggestions.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:33, closed)
Not suggestions, queries.
Question marks at the end.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:50, closed)
stop digging, thicko

(, Fri 30 May 2014, 7:38, closed)
1998
I think was 1998...
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 17:47, closed)
and students didn't pay tax in 1998? what are you pricking on about?

(, Sat 31 May 2014, 7:57, closed)
I didnt THINK I did.
My memory is a bit hazy - probably due to the lack of stock control at the bar I worked ..
(, Sat 31 May 2014, 20:12, closed)
Dicko, not thicko.
If you would be so very kind.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 21:28, closed)
very late in the day I would add
this is typical burden-of-proof shifting as opposed to answering the original question-except it is with another question. I see how it works now. Debating Society champion stuff.

Along with name calling to elicit a hostile response. I didn't spot it at the time. I hope to amend my slack ways in the future.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 0:13, closed)
No he mentions a wage of £250 which is very recent.

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:18, closed)
and the personal allowance is always increasing so the further you go into the UPPER CASE PAST the more tax you'd have had to pay on it

(, Thu 29 May 2014, 22:20, closed)
Thank you for your contribution Mr Brittas.
We'll be in touch.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 21:36, closed)
If there was 'no stock control' you should have introduced a decent one to implement a proper skim (and bonus from the Boss for maintaining cost control)
and to fire shit staff when the stock-taker found the discrepancies.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 21:59, closed)
"Literally limitless"
supply of beer: explain how that works.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 23:15, closed)
Probably functionality limitless.
As in more than they could hope to drink. Either that, or their drinking was at a pace that meant the next delivery would replenish the supply before they ran out.
(, Thu 29 May 2014, 23:34, closed)
There's a good article in The Economist
that will explain to you in plain terms the hyperbolic usage of literally.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 1:50, closed)
By hyperbolic, do you mean incorrect?
The problem with using the word literally in that way, is you're not simply reappropriating a word for another use, you're actually using it to mean the complete opposite of what is intended.

"My mum was so angry, she literally killed me!"

No... she figuratively killed you. 'Killed' here is a figure of speech, and the literal meaning of it is completely incorrect.

Now, I have no doubt that the Economist hand-waves its way to forgiving people for using language idiotically, but that isn't going to stop people who know what the hell they're talking about from being dismissive of those mediocre plebs who use these words incorrectly.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 17:03, closed)
for FUCKS sake.
There was so much beer in the stock room, we could not have drunk it all. Hence - LITERALLY limitless.
Although, obviously it WAS limited, as a ratio - it was technically limitless.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 17:45, closed)
Just because your stomach capacity was lower than the limit on the quantity of beer present, doesn't mean it didn't have one.
But the point has been made now, so I'll fuck off.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 17:56, closed)
I just had another one.
Beer, that is. Fuck it's friday!!!
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 17:59, closed)
I think this is the thing where using 'Literally'
is incorrect if you didn't write it down at the time.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 21:22, closed)
"Yes, we could drink as much stock as we wanted - but we had to pay for it (full price, too, no staff discount or anything)."
So you're saying that you were allowed to buy things. Bravo.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 14:12, closed)
lol, this

(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:29, closed)
Yes.
It was one of the perks of the job being able to buy things.
Wild times, crazy.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 17:47, closed)

« Go Back

Pages: Popular, 4, 3, 2, 1