![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Freddie Woo tells us: Despite being a well rounded modern man I think women are best off getting married and having a few kids else they'll be absolutely miserable come middle age.
What views do you have that are probably sexist that you believe are true?
( , Sun 27 Dec 2009, 12:23)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If a guy who is interested in you texts with lots of xxxx's at the end, or texts lots of times without a reply then he's just regarded as being really keen and it's encouraged? (as has been known to happen) But if the girl responds and does anywhere near half the same she is seen as whiningly desperate and he runs away like the wind? Its sickening.
( , Wed 6 Jan 2010, 20:08, 16 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
who's "the girl" sending these texts then?
( , Wed 6 Jan 2010, 23:22, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
dump him. now. seriously
( , Wed 6 Jan 2010, 23:42, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Until your friends convince you that he's a keeper and you're just being cynical. The bastards
( , Wed 6 Jan 2010, 23:56, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Personally I'd think exactly the opposite, guys look desperate, girls look keen (though that depends on the volume of texts, 2-3 once a week or so, ok, every hour on the hour for a month... just weird)
( , Thu 7 Jan 2010, 1:49, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I would say it is the other waay round, geezers are seen as desperate whereas lasses are keen and interested.
( , Thu 7 Jan 2010, 4:59, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but apparently responding in kind is a real turn off, hence the cloud of dust rising up behind him. Sexism at it's worst (best?).
( , Thu 7 Jan 2010, 11:13, closed)
« Go Back