
I've just been asked to plan a redesign for my magazine's two websites (we have a US/ Canada and a rest of the world edition). They are currently a wee bit useless, and haven't been updated in an age, plus don't come anywhere near high enough in search engine rankings.
My basic plan is to whack a blog type device on them to increase hit rate, and keep it updated. But I also need any suggestions of other content / features I should put up on there (think about the sorts of thing you want from a magazine's website, but bear in mind that copyright issues mean we can't have too many pictures or copy from within the magazine itself as we'd have to pay extra, and have precisely no budget), and basic layout ideas.
Linkies:
UK/rest of world version: www.heritagemagazine.co.uk/
US/Canadian version: www.realm-magazine.com/
Ta.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:43, archived)

A covers gallery?
Priority 1: Lose the motherfucking frames.
*edit* If you want your blogging software off the shelf, try WordPress or Moveabletype.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:46, archived)

frames are still valid in both transitional and strict XHTML.
They still suck balls though.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:49, archived)

All I know is it's a bit shit at the moment, and looks like it was designed by a retarded twelve year old as part of a class project.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:50, archived)

Good CSS design makes it easier for search engines to catalogue your page for a start.
My advice would be, don't overdo it. If it's not going to carry content, you're basically after a basic contact and service page. The dated content management idea's not bad. It will keep some peoploe checking back. Perhaps and online event diary is a good idea. Also, searchable maps? That's alot of work/expensive though. Although the AA/RAC/Multimap mioght sponsor it.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:54, archived)

Map thing may not be a bad idea... could just provide lots of links to Multimap/Streetmap for relevant things though.
Simple's the way forward, as I'm probably going to be lumbered with keeping the thing going once it's up and running. My ability to post pictures of kittens and links to goatse is probably not going to come in overly handy on this one...
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:00, archived)

find a site you like, steal the code, change the content.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:03, archived)

*steals code for www.hardcorearseslutsgetitinallholes.com*
*starts changing content*
*changes mind and leaves content as it is*
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:09, archived)

Antialiasing on the graphics.
Try to make sure the graphics are antialiased correctly. If you're using photoshop, make sure you're editing in RGB mode, which will automatically antialias everything anyway (unless you specifically ask it not to).
Makes stuff look nice and smooth.
Oh, and for transparent graphics, make sure that the matting colour is matched up to the background you'll be using, otherwise you may get fringing around the image.
If you're not using PS, I have no idea how to do it in anything else :-)
edit: i'm with the others on frames though. No likey.
edit2: oops, typos :-)
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:20, archived)

No idea who set up the current thing - graphics certainly look a bit shitty though.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:24, archived)

Read and laugh
www.snpp.com/guides/ralph.file.html
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:55, archived)

( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:57, archived)

down my face
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:11, archived)

( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:11, archived)

* my favourite fruit scone recipe
* how to overpronounce the word "sandwiches"
* foxes? fuck'em
* eight shaggin' quid each to see a shaggin' rose garden and some rare breed shaggin' pigs? Discuss.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:47, archived)

from absolutely everywhere.
Although I do admire its ridiculousness.
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 12:54, archived)

I wrote can be updated by complete window lickers - you can nab it if you like
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:13, archived)

I was thinking of doing some kind of auto redirect to Blogger (or whatever the technical term is for when you're looking at a page hosted on a different site, but it looks like you're still on the same one), but an open source blog code could be better...
( , Thu 9 Sep 2004, 13:26, archived)