![Challenge Entry: Mock Green Britain Day [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the Mock Green Britain Day challenge. See all 141 entries (closed)
( , Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:44, archived)

3/10. Flounce off and try again.
b3ta.com/board/10093542
Or stick around and get a woo or 10.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:49,
archived)
b3ta.com/board/10093542
Or stick around and get a woo or 10.

and then keep it going and going and going. Like my having won every image challenge b3ta has ever done.
It was a joke, note the compo'ing of it, I was also posting things in other threads at the same time, no one flounced there.
*hate
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:53,
archived)
It was a joke, note the compo'ing of it, I was also posting things in other threads at the same time, no one flounced there.
*hate

but not in a quitting way. I'm always getting wound up :)
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:57,
archived)



Possibly Rob's? Was a hint of 'I'll be able to get paid for two hours' work on the site again' but I'm new here so unsure. EDIT Oh ok.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:59,
archived)

corporate fucks like the rest.....we willing to promote them on b3ta?
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:03,
archived)

They very likely know they're as much a target for the cynical satirists of b3ta as anyone. Smart bunch, b3tans, they can see through a fair amount of corporate BS.
If Rob can make a few quid off them, then I say go for it. It's his site, he has bills to pay, and this site has given me plenty of fun for minimal cost (apart from the wasted years... sigh).
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:11,
archived)
If Rob can make a few quid off them, then I say go for it. It's his site, he has bills to pay, and this site has given me plenty of fun for minimal cost (apart from the wasted years... sigh).

I was about to type pretty much the same. If you don't like it, move on to the next challenge or make something else from scratch.
Edit: like I have to do with nearly every image challenge.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:15,
archived)
Edit: like I have to do with nearly every image challenge.

just the automatic criticism of nuclear energy, when it's neither based on fact nor science, is a bit useless. It just smells of jumping on a nuclear-bashing bandwagon without considering the actual statistics and SCIENCE behind it all. Again, not accusing anyone of puppetry, just that the principle of the challenge seems a little ignorant of the truth.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:51,
archived)

i can never think of anything for these more satirical challenges, clever wit is hard.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 23:54,
archived)

it's a nonsense suggesting that because it's over seas from them they don't care too much
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:01,
archived)

also...what the fuck's happening ?can't even upload now ffs
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 0:01,
archived)