You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10298752 (Thread)

# First proper tattyshop I've done for a while. Hopefully not bindun.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:27, archived)
# that'll do spicely
: D
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:31, archived)
# Shockingly overlooked comment.
Didn't get the condiments it deserved.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 16:51, archived)
# Is there some kind of law now that Nicholas Cage has to be in every 3rd film Hollywood produces
regardless of how suitable he is for the role?
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:33, archived)
# he does seem to appear in a lot of stuff
most of it low-rent shite.. maybe he's saving up for something REALLY expensive :D
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:35, archived)
# Maybe he's going to but a second fish!:O
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:35, archived)
# Did he head-but his first fish then?
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:58, archived)
# Well who wouldn't
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:27, archived)
# Maybe his leg had just grow?
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:03, archived)
# I think he spent all his
money and is now doing any pile of shite that has a paycheck.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:35, archived)
# Yep, he was declared bankrupt
a while back.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:38, archived)
# ah, he owed $6.3 Million to the IRS
that might explain the barrel scraping :)
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:40, archived)
# The thing is, I doubt it's his fault
It's more me wondering what the fuck the casting agents are thinking about? Cage is about the LEAST medieval looking or acting type in existence, why he's in this is an utter mystery?
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:47, archived)
# It's the way hollywood works
the studios get a big name in it, so it's likely to make more money. And if it flops, their backs are covered.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:49, archived)
# Plus if he(*)'s attached to a film it's more likely to get produced in the first place...
(*) - or any other 'name'
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:02, archived)
# To be fair
Ron Perlman is the ONLY actor in Hollywood who looks medieval, and he can't star in EVERYTHING. As cool as that would be
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:23, archived)
# Yes.
I hear he's up for the title role of the HOllywood version of the Vicar of Dibley.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:36, archived)
# Regardless of suitability?
Be fair. If suitability for the role was a criterion, he'd never get any work at all.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:58, archived)
# have you seen the wicker man remake?
No actor could have been more perfect for the role.
1 of my favourite comedies
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:38, archived)
# Well, perhaps for the role of the actual wicker man...
Wait a sec: that's what you meant, isn't it?

Damn. I'm slow today.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:45, archived)
# no it's not!
He's fantastic in it, youtube if you haven't seen clips already!
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 14:49, archived)
# i saw him on glastonbury high street last month.
TRUFAX
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:39, archived)
# Was he following a pagan around with a pepperpot?
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:45, archived)
# He's playing Michael Eavis in the
Glastonbury movie.
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:57, archived)
# ^ Lilly Allen?
(, Wed 5 Jan 2011, 13:51, archived)