Also,,,, Happy Birthday to Sir David Attenborough and Sid James...
Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Sun 8 May 2011, 9:44,
archived)
OK one final one from me for now....Unfortunately, because Enrique stole Josie's underwear this morning, I was left with Josie in her Birthday suit...
So I knocked this one out for youall some of you... NSFW
(So I knocked this one out for you
Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:03,
archived)
Needs less tit blocking.ning
(
Whato_Jeeves Did your surgery require a vaginal mesh patch?,
Sun 8 May 2011, 10:21,
archived)
^ This (sorry)and that ¬
( Wobbly Bloke Hello, did I miss anything on,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:36,
archived)
Is that one of them zen koans?
Sea Tramp the thinking woman's 8 Ace,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:26,
archived)
*deep sigh*We like to keep b3ta free from any images which are, or could be mistaken as pornographic. Lots of employers take a dim view of people using their work computer to look at porn and in some places it can get you sacked on the spot.
We don't want to censor people, or make a moral judgement about what they should be looking at, we would simply ask that any pictures which could be mistaken for porn are linked with an appropriate warning for those viewing at work.
Please don't be offended if your picture is linked by a moderator for being NSFW, it may well be very tame but we tend to err on the side of caution in these circumstances. It's nothing personal.
A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity, but a badly drawn picture of a spunking cock isn't NSFW (unless there is a fetish site for badly drawn, spunking cocks that nobody told us about).
(We don't want to censor people, or make a moral judgement about what they should be looking at, we would simply ask that any pictures which could be mistaken for porn are linked with an appropriate warning for those viewing at work.
Please don't be offended if your picture is linked by a moderator for being NSFW, it may well be very tame but we tend to err on the side of caution in these circumstances. It's nothing personal.
A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity, but a badly drawn picture of a spunking cock isn't NSFW (unless there is a fetish site for badly drawn, spunking cocks that nobody told us about).
Richard Shitheels,
Sun 8 May 2011, 12:49,
archived)
Aw, you've stolen his thunder.(and completely destroyed the 'making a gif' wank excuse for everyone else)
( Sea Tramp the thinking woman's 8 Ace,
Sun 8 May 2011, 11:48,
archived)
have a wank to this(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 8 May 2011, 12:36,
archived)
I still say that there is a certain charm about her PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 8 May 2011, 13:11,
archived)
did Katy Perry ever marry this chap?(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 8 May 2011, 13:27,
archived)
hahahahawhere did you get those pics of me from? please remove them from teh internet stat!
(
Avast is still alive!!!!,
Sun 8 May 2011, 12:41,
archived)
Is this not clearly NSFW?*hides*
( LordManley twitter.com/LordManley,
Sun 8 May 2011, 14:43,
archived)
