b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10504404 (Thread)

# Still don't get it.
I've been unemployed, I've been bored, I've been angry.

Oddly, I've never thought to loot and burn down a shop to get what I want, though, I've always been under the impression that I should get a job and earn the money to get what I want. Clearly I was wrong about this. I'm going to start mugging grannies - they tend to go down like a sack of spuds once you hit them.

I take it McDonald's aren't taking on staff these days. Or Starbucks. Or Burger King. Or Greggs. Or the council.

Yeah. I'm not happy. I think I might go and torch something. It's my right (I know my rights). What are they gonna do? The prisons are full - give me an ASBO? I'll wear it.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:05, archived)
# yes, you've been brought up well.
others have not.

We can either ignore that environments exist in which people are brought up to display such behaviour or seek to deal with the reasons for it.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:14, archived)
# Well - if you'd like to lay out the excuses for not bringing someone up well, that would be great.
"Being poor" is not an excuse. I know plenty of people - some of whom don't even have their own butlers - who are impecably behaved, despite having been brought up very much on the wrong side of the tracks.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:19, archived)
# "Why are chavs" is a huge enigma, though.
What you've just said there is pretty much "chavs because chavs".
Once again, though, you might be right. The whole thing might just be noise.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:23, archived)
# not excuses, reasons.
poor health and education of parents are factors.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:29, archived)
# It's a recursive thing, isn't it?
Being brought up badly would explain why that person then brings someone else up badly.

From a lot of comments I've seen dismissing any idea of upbringing being a factor, I think a lot of people don't like the idea that we can be raised to be bad, simply because it means that our personalities are merely a product of luck, rather than some magical unchangable thing special to ourselves.

That said, excusing the violence entirely because of 'society' is not only dumb, but incredibly patronising to people from the same backgrounds who do not act like that.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:44, archived)
# I've said many times, that I am not excusing anything
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:48, archived)
# Sorry, that line wasn't aimed at you.
I agree with your stance.

It was more a general comment on many comments I've seen that do seem completely divided down two extreme opinions, and refusing to accept that it can be both the individual and society to blame.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:54, archived)
# Oh, the upbringing angle
that's even more baffling territory. I'm a bit afraid the riots will be used to argue for all sorts of harsh and primitive discipline, and cause pointless heartache and pain and screwed-upness for future generations, who will still riot anyway.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:21, archived)
# yep that's a valid worry
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:30, archived)
# Sadly I suspect you are right.
The whole thing flags up lots of long-term problems which need fixing - schooling etc, but I suspect that they will all be ignored for quick fixes in dealing with crime after the event.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:49, archived)
# I was more worrying about headteachers recommending that parents say "no" more
and blaming the riots on a failure of parents to say "no". And then the parents say "no" to their kids a lot, thinking that they're instilling a sense of discipline and obedience, resulting in kids who are both angrier and more ignorant (because they haven't been allowed experiences), and worse at relating to people (because any attempt at negotiation over something they want just leads to "no").
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:03, archived)
# ahem
Just because the rioters are "criminal scum", does not mean it is not sensible to work out (and implement) ways of reducing the production of "criminal scum" attitudes in the future.

Edit: it's nice that y'all can pattern match and work out that vandals/looters are antisocial criminals. But pattern matching gives only a diagnosis, it isn't a cure. A cure involves understanding the dynamics of how people come to behave like that, and working to change or control those dynamics.
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 11:58, archived)
# Agreed!
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 12:09, archived)
# excellent
I notice there aren't any angry responses to this. Is it because you're more concise, or simply because you're absolutely right?
(, Wed 10 Aug 2011, 22:10, archived)