![Challenge Entry: b3ta Christmas Cards [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
From the b3ta Christmas Cards challenge. See all 159 entries (closed)
( , Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:11, archived)

Needs more Santa, presents, trees, robins, snow etc. etc.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:15,
archived)

with cows, sheep, a donkey, reindeer, penguins, a polar bear, a dragon and some shreks
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:17,
archived)

I have no issue with the penguins being in the stable though. They'd keep the polar bear's attention away from Jesus.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:27,
archived)

( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:30,
archived)

"Fiona", the disco ball, the squirrel or Shrek's inability to close his mouth
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:23,
archived)

these are full size too, pretty much
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:24,
archived)


which is why they developed such awesome geometric art, as well as patterns based on extremely elaborate caligraphy.
They almost invented an aperiodic tiling of the plane, look up Girih tiles and cf. Penrose tiling.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:35,
archived)
They almost invented an aperiodic tiling of the plane, look up Girih tiles and cf. Penrose tiling.

They're just not allowed to worship them.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:39,
archived)

but I believe they're technically not even allowed to make them, you know, just in case.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:43,
archived)

that I just used that picture, which is widely available, and added some text to it.
*peeks through curtains*
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:49,
archived)
*peeks through curtains*

no surprises there.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aniconism_in_Islam
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:49,
archived)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aniconism_in_Islam

The Qur'an, the Islamic holy book, does not explicitly prohibit the depiction of human figures; it merely condemns idolatry (5:87โ92, 21:51โ52).
Everything else is down to interpretation. Modern interpretation is no less valid than ancient interpretation.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:55,
archived)
Everything else is down to interpretation. Modern interpretation is no less valid than ancient interpretation.

It's all nonsense anyway.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:57,
archived)

for whether it's down to interpretation or not.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:58,
archived)

although I wouldn't want to publicly doubt it myself.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 17:04,
archived)

which the Sunnis take quite seriously. Representative art has been prohibited by some of the stricter sects, and still is.
Modern interpretation isn't necessarily any more valid than ancient interpretation, either. Well I'm no Muslim scholar so I can't comment on the validity of either.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 17:00,
archived)
Modern interpretation isn't necessarily any more valid than ancient interpretation, either. Well I'm no Muslim scholar so I can't comment on the validity of either.

then Christians and Jews aren't allowed to draw pictures either.
"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:"
I've no idea what the original Hebrew says and modern Bibles tend to ditch the "or any likeness part", but whether that means that this simply bans the production of graven images, or whether that's a modern Christian making excuses for common modern practice (as in the habit of wearing polycotton, for instance, or all those times you cook kid in its mothers' milk - I do that *all* the time) I genuinely have no idea. I actually suspect the former, but I like to think the latter so I can irritate Christians who mock the Muslims for not drawing pictures. I'm a very irritating kind of person.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 16:56,
archived)
"Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:"
I've no idea what the original Hebrew says and modern Bibles tend to ditch the "or any likeness part", but whether that means that this simply bans the production of graven images, or whether that's a modern Christian making excuses for common modern practice (as in the habit of wearing polycotton, for instance, or all those times you cook kid in its mothers' milk - I do that *all* the time) I genuinely have no idea. I actually suspect the former, but I like to think the latter so I can irritate Christians who mock the Muslims for not drawing pictures. I'm a very irritating kind of person.

to get out of anything the Old Testament says, but the argument about the gold cherubim in the Temple in Jerusalem is an interesting one. Apparently they don't count, because they're only gold plated and not solid gold. Thus sayeth the rabbis.
I don't know but I always found statues just a little bit creepy anyway.
( ,
Thu 6 Dec 2012, 17:03,
archived)
I don't know but I always found statues just a little bit creepy anyway.

christians duck out of everything they don't like. it's a happy way of life.